Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

happyslug

(14,779 posts)
39. Here is the makeup of Congress through the years
Wed Dec 4, 2013, 02:17 AM
Dec 2013

Last edited Wed Dec 4, 2013, 03:20 AM - Edit history (1)

http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774721.html

............................................Senate.................................House of Representatives
Congress....Years,........ Total Dem REP OTHERS....Total, ...Dem,.. REP.. OTHERs..Vacant
71st.....1929–1931......96.....39.....56..... 1 -----—-- 435.....163.....267.....1.............4
72nd....1931–1933......96.....47.....48..... 1 ------—- 435.....216.....218.....1 —
73rd.....1933–1935......96.....59.....36..... 1 ------—- 435.....313.....117.....5 —
74th.....1935–1937......96.....69.....25..... 2 ------—- 435.....322.....103.....10 —
75th.....1937–1939.....96.....75..... 17.....4 ------—-- 435.....333.....89..... 13 —
76th.....1939–1941.....96.....69..... 23.....4 ------—-- 435.....262.....169.....4 —
77th.....1941–1943.....96.....66..... 28.....2 ------—-- 435.....267.....162.....6 —
78th.....1943–1945.....96.....57..... 38.....1 ------—-- 435.....222.....209.....4 —
79th.....1945–1947.....96.....57..... 38.....1 ------—-- 435.....243.....190.....2 —


Read more: Composition of Congress by Party 1855–2013 | Infoplease.com http://www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0774721.html#ixzz2mU6K9kfO

Just look at the 75th Congress, the "Court Packing" Congress of 1937 to 1939 (elected in 1938). 23 GOP Senators out of 96 (2/3 of 96 is 64m thus from 1935 till 1941 you had more then enough Democrats to end any GOP lead filibuster unless the Filibuster also included Democrats).

In the 75th Congress you had only 89 GOP, AND members of the following parties:

Wisconsin Progressive (P): 7
Progressive (P): 1
Farmer-Labor (FL): 5

The Wisconsin Progressive were Seven GOP progressive who jumped the GOP but in subsequent years returned to the GOP

The Progressive party member was a former GOP progressive on his way to being a Democrat

The Five Farmer-Labor party had started in 1920, but the 1930s was strong only in Minnesota (Where it had started). In 1944 it merged with the Minnesota Democratic Party to become the Farmer-Labor-Democratic Party of Minnesota (The Democratic Party in Minnesota).

Remember from the election of 1930 to the election of 1994 (1931-1995 for actual terms of office), the Democrats were in the Majority of the House except for 1947-1948 (Truman's do nothing Congress, which he ran against more then Dewey his GOP opponent).

The Senate was clearly Democratic from 1933 (after the election of 1932) till 1947 (after the election of 1946), Then again from 1949 (election of 1948) till 1953 (election of 1952). Then from 1955 (Election of 1954) till Reagan in 1981 (Election of 1980) and would GOP till 1987 (election of 1988) and would remain Democratic till 1995 (election of 1994).

As to actual Numbers of Democrats in the House and Senate, it was overwhelming in 1935-1941 period, the only things close is the 1959-1971 period. The highest number of Democratic Senators was in 1937-1939, when you had 75 Democratic Senators and 333 Democratic Members of the House (Out of a total of 96 Senators and 435 Members of the House). In the 1938 election the numbers of Senators dropped in 69 out of 96 total Senators. The 1938 saw a huge drop in the number of Democrats in the House from 333 to 262, out of 435).

FDR kept Congress overwhelmingly Democratic from 1933 till 1939 (election of 1932 to 1938).

The Second period of Democratic Domination was the 1960s. The Democratic Party surged in the election of 1958, winning 64 out of 96 Senate Seats and 234 in the House. in the election of 1958 the GOP won 201 seats, the most seats it will hold in the House till the election of 1994. The Democrats in the Senate would surge to 68 in 1965-1967 Congress (and would have been 69, but that is the year Storm Thumond defected to the GOP). They will be more then 60 Democratic Senators till 1969, and 58 till 1971. The number would drop to 54 in 1971, then back up to 56 in 1973, 61 in 1975 and remain at 61 till January 1979 when it would drop to 58. The GOP would take the Senate in the 1980 election, thus the GOP was majority in the Senate from 1981 till 1987.
He had a killer congress, like fucking liberal butter. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #1
I doubt she will run. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #2
Yes, but Bernie might! NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #4
Bernie would have a great campaign but I doubt he would beat Hillary. But that should not stop him hrmjustin Dec 2013 #5
Any Liberal can beat Hillary like a drum MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #19
I have my doubts about that. I think she will be our next president. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #20
Which liberals do you have in mind? Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #29
Bernie Sanders winning the Democratic nomination over Hillary Clinton???? Beacool Dec 2013 #66
Be honest... wouldn't you actually cry? nt MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #67
No, because it wouldn't happen in a million years. Beacool Dec 2013 #69
He would easily beat Hillary. And that is why we are seeing so much anger that he is even sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #38
You. Are. Not. Alone. Enthusiast Dec 2013 #41
Nope! Although I love Bernie, that is just wishful thinking. jazzimov Dec 2013 #65
Really? Well, let's see what happens. If the Dem Candidate is not someone Dems can vote FOR sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #73
Angry? Beacool Dec 2013 #68
What makes you think Bernie would want the Democratic nomination? dflprincess Dec 2013 #72
Ah, Agiesm rears its ugly head, right here on a progressive forum. You might want to be careful sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #77
There's no comparison. Beacool Dec 2013 #81
You're right, there is no comparison. And one of them has zero chance of being elected. sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #82
I do not have a short memory about the war. I have forgiven her for her vote. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #74
I assume you are not one of the tragic victims of that 'vote'. It is not for us to forgive those who sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #75
This is the story of how my cousin was killed in Iraq. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #76
I'm sorry about your cousin too. He should be here, living his life rather than being sent to sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #78
Thank you. It was a horrible war and should not have happened. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #80
Thank you for understanding. I have read the article on your cousin and I am sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #83
You presume a lot when you insist that Hillary knew that Bush was lying. Beacool Dec 2013 #84
If she didn't know, that is even worse, isn't it? Someone in a position to help stop sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #86
Remember DU rules, you can NOT support a NON- Democratic Candidate ON DU. happyslug Dec 2013 #37
Bernie Sanders is a Democratic Socialist. I am hoping more Democrats will join him sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #79
Says who? Beacool Dec 2013 #85
Do you know how many vetoes FDR had? MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #3
Thank you for making my point. He had the power. NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #6
With all due respect... Yes, you *are* missing something. MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #12
Do your remember the "line item veto"? NYC_SKP Dec 2013 #15
Was there a rules change that I'm unaware of? MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #18
Yep... awoke_in_2003 Dec 2013 #35
A line item veto law was enacted during the Clinton administration. former9thward Dec 2013 #45
Question about all that liberal stuff you reference in your OP Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #7
Seems you are trying to make an argument by Just Asking Questions. rhett o rick Dec 2013 #10
Why are you following me around from thread to thread? Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #11
Question about asking people to go away MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #13
I'll answer questions from people who don't stalk me Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #16
Both houses of Congress were Democratically controlled MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #17
What kind of control are we talking about? Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #21
Democrats won 53% of the House in 1932 MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #24
Damn! Good for FDR and America! Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #27
Obama could have had the same thing happen Doctor_J Dec 2013 #43
It's DU's dream babble like that ends up making me laugh. "Gerrymandering"- look it up. KittyWampus Dec 2013 #49
There wouldn't have been "Gerrymandering" if he'd presided like he campaigned Doctor_J Dec 2013 #62
Build great majorities in Congress. SO simple and so obvious FogerRox Dec 2013 #70
Here is the makeup of Congress through the years happyslug Dec 2013 #39
Thanks for all that info... Cali_Democrat Dec 2013 #40
Thanks for that fadedrose Dec 2013 #47
Eisenhower was a Republican... but he was a Liberal MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #51
You also see the shift of the Democratic Party from Rural to Urban based happyslug Dec 2013 #71
Recommend your post...! KoKo Dec 2013 #89
Those are good questions, and I noticed you never got an answer. jazzimov Dec 2013 #64
In what way is the political and economic context of 1990-2000 relevant to 1940? Spider Jerusalem Dec 2013 #8
I think what we are seeing here is the danger of reducing history to trivia BainsBane Dec 2013 #23
"I welcome their donations" -FDR Fumesucker Dec 2013 #9
Certainly, if FDR had been more of a pragmatist MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #14
"My party has become dependent on entitlements" - FDR Doctor_J Dec 2013 #44
If the semiconductor had been invented in 1634 BainsBane Dec 2013 #22
Hmm... we had a depression in the 1930s, we have a depression now MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #25
We had a strong labor movement putting pressure on FDR BainsBane Dec 2013 #28
"I welcome their hatred" MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #32
Okay. So? BainsBane Dec 2013 #63
We have a Depression, now? JoePhilly Dec 2013 #46
Only for the 99% MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #52
If you are going to throw around a word like "Depression" ... JoePhilly Dec 2013 #55
A Rise in Wealth for the Wealthy; Declines for the Lower 93% MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #59
Zero evidence? Didn't I read an OP from you recently in which you bought JoePhilly Dec 2013 #60
Well, it's hard evidence that our son's allowance isn't in a depression. MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #61
And America in 2013 is a center right nation Fumesucker Dec 2013 #26
Yes, over & over they say it, traipsing through the graveyard. Eleanors38 Dec 2013 #30
Inaccurate comparison MFrohike Dec 2013 #31
Which is why I picked 1940 MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #33
I get you MFrohike Dec 2013 #34
I'll toast to that! MannyGoldstein Dec 2013 #36
Elizabeth Warren has a way better chance than most and it'd be a great tribute to Ted Kennedy. CorrectOfCenter Dec 2013 #42
When are you going to start DU's FDR group? JoePhilly Dec 2013 #48
Great post. And made this waste o'thread at least useful. Good job. KittyWampus Dec 2013 #50
Exactly it's only to pit FDR against Obama treestar Dec 2013 #54
So you don't like one of the Democratic Party's most popular and effective Presidents? sabrina 1 Dec 2013 #87
Did I say that? No. FDR was a great President. JoePhilly Dec 2013 #88
1940 republican platform: pampango Dec 2013 #53
White racists voted overwhelmingly Democratic back then. geek tragedy Dec 2013 #56
This message was self-deleted by its author madfloridian Dec 2013 #57
Yeah, all he had to do was stack his cabinet with bankers Corruption Inc Dec 2013 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»If FDR had run as a Third...»Reply #39