Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Kaptur Defeats Kucinich 94% to 4% on 100% Unverifiable E-Vote Systems in Toledo, OH? [View all]Response to NYC Liberal (Reply #12)
Post removed
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Kaptur Defeats Kucinich 94% to 4% on 100% Unverifiable E-Vote Systems in Toledo, OH? [View all]
BradBlog
Mar 2012
OP
No. Tell me: did you think it was "fishy" when Obama won 92% of the DC vote in 2008,
NYC Liberal
Mar 2012
#12
I asked you this question below but you might have missed it. Were they running against other
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#17
Well, that's very different. These were two Democrats and I know for me, eg, it was a difficult
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#22
Well his district obviously disagrees with you. He has been reelected repeatedly as she has
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#29
Those numbers were vs Republicans. Which would seemingly make such a margin
NYC Liberal
Mar 2012
#20
Thanks, actually I think that it is more strange in a district that is so Democratic to have numbers
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#25
I agree and I am sure even if there were errors it would not change the results.
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#31
In the 2004 Democratic Presidential Primary DK only got 2.7 percent of Lucas County
onenote
Mar 2012
#113
That's exactly my point: Obama, Kerry, and Gore all won over 90% with no "fixing" of the vote.
NYC Liberal
Mar 2012
#53
But has she ever, or has anyone ever other than Saddam Hussein, won by this kind of margin before?
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#13
Ya know, Brad, early on in the e-voting debate, I told everyone that, sooner or later, results...
Junkdrawer
Mar 2012
#11
The insiders who worked the issue hard got disabused of the Dem vs Rep nature of the problem....
Junkdrawer
Mar 2012
#38
Democratic candidates have consistently won 85-90% of the vote in DC in presidential elections.
NYC Liberal
Mar 2012
#14
I would wonder if those numbers were tallied via an unverifiable e-vote machine...
LanternWaste
Mar 2012
#118
BULLFUCKING SHIT, if you read the link it's the machines have a voter-verified paper audit trail.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#34
Yes, that has happened and has been done before. Ask for a public records request.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#40
3506.18 Electronic voting machine - verified paper audit trail as official ballot in recount.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#63
Voter verified paper audit trails shall be preserved in the same manner and for the same time period
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#67
You can request an audit. Please do. But then you wouldn't get hits on your site...
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#39
What the hell is wrong with you, dude? And why are YOU posting false information??
BradBlog
Mar 2012
#57
I have already established that you are posting misinformation. Call me a liar all you want.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#73
You're the one contending that something fishy is going on, yet all your evidence is...
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#76
"question about the seemingly implausible and certainly unverifiable results"
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#78
Actually Brad has responded to almost all of joshcryer's posts most of which
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#127
Yes you did. "make sure to be clear that it is YOU who does not understand what he posted"
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#83
It is only YOUR opinion that the 'OP is not giving correct information' and it is my
sabrina 1
Mar 2012
#88
I have established that the information is wrong. It is not 100% unverifiable.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#89
You have "established" nothing of the kind. But you HAVE defamed me with your misinformation.
BradBlog
Mar 2012
#98
I've yet to be convinced. See, the poll workers, in the end, are the weakest link.
joshcryer
Mar 2012
#81
I like Kucinich as much as the next guy but I'm sick of all this conspiracy shit....
FLAprogressive
Mar 2012
#54
I wonder how many here that are making uninformed comments have actually been to Toledo.
SmellyFeet
Mar 2012
#91
Well duh! We've all been here long enough to know that if my preferred candidate loses,
tritsofme
Mar 2012
#95
It may be verifiable, but is is never verified unless you actually do an audit
eridani
Mar 2012
#106
Utter nonsense. Lucas County has touchscreen DREs, which can never be verified.
eridani
Mar 2012
#132
You still haven't explained why we should trust the output of any proprietary software
eridani
Mar 2012
#137
Not at all. Unless you are suggesting that forensic analysis of programs is routine
eridani
Mar 2012
#145
You're entitled to your opinion, but it wasn't peer pressure - it was a careful review of the thread
HopeHoops
Mar 2012
#108
Issues be damned, name recognition ALONE should have been, what, 5% to 15%....
Junkdrawer
Mar 2012
#107
I'm told there are some people out there who actually don't follow issues....
Junkdrawer
Mar 2012
#117
Even if they didn't follow issues, anyone showing up to vote in a Democratic primary in Lucas County
onenote
Mar 2012
#119
Let's say 10% of primary voters voted purely on name recognition and not issues...
Junkdrawer
Mar 2012
#120
It is sad that people just refuse to realize that outside of his district in Ohio,
Ikonoklast
Mar 2012
#104
What do you want? A perfect recording of actual votes? Now that's plain silly!
Better Believe It
Mar 2012
#124
Would we be having this debate if the vote in Lucas County was 75/25 for Kaptur?
onenote
Mar 2012
#129
If you knew anything about Ohio politics you would know that DK is NOT beloved in any
WCGreen
Mar 2012
#139