General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: What I believe [View all]Sissyk
(12,665 posts)but your transparancy page shows you should care due to the new rules soon to be in place.
At Fri Oct 11, 2013, 10:36 AM an alert was sent on the following post:
it's their vile disgusting flat out lies that I deplore.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3828142
REASON FOR ALERT:
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
ALERTER'S COMMENTS:
Come off it... Is the kind of discourse civil or productive in any way?
You served on a randomly-selected Jury of DU members which reviewed this post. The review was completed at Fri Oct 11, 2013, 10:41 AM, and the Jury voted 3-3 to LEAVE IT.
Juror #1 voted to HIDE IT and said: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: ah jeez. dumb alert.
Juror #3 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: I see no reason to hide this post. I've seen some of the comments made to her about the OP she posted and they weren't pretty.
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE and said: Discourse is discourse, if you feel the post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate, address that.
Juror #5 voted to HIDE IT and said: Knock it off, Cali... We all make mistakes sometimes. Admit yours and move on--or don't, but at least move on.
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT and said: Not at all. Cali can not call other DUers liars. And, that is exactly what she is doing in this post. She needs to talk about the post, not the posters.
Thank you very much for participating in our Jury system, and we hope you will be able to participate again in the future.