Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

randome

(34,845 posts)

4. The vast majority of websites are poorly designed.

Reply to steve2470 (Original post)

Thu Oct 3, 2013, 08:34 PM

Oct 2013

Heavy on unneeded graphics and 'whiz-bang' tools that do nothing to add to the flow of information.

Do you realize how fast information can be transmitted across the globe? Yet it moves at a comparative snail's pace because of all the overhead.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So, which website looks better ? 1991 Cern one or 1998-era Freep one ? [View all] steve2470 Oct 2013 OP

Actually freeperland website is very easy to use...Othr sites as well fitman Oct 2013 #1

Nope, FR has no index for threads. It's brain-damaged. DU is smooth, powerful, easy, reliable. nt Bernardo de La Paz Oct 2013 #2

I think this site is easy to use, once you learn the basics nt steve2470 Oct 2013 #3

"Free Republic - so easy, idiots can use it! And do!" nt NoGOPZone Oct 2013 #9

The vast majority of websites are poorly designed. randome Oct 2013 #4

the freep site is a classic example of a poorly designed one, more ugly than poorly designed nt steve2470 Oct 2013 #5

Simple organizational skills could go a long way in making it more user-friendly. randome Oct 2013 #6

+1. Apart from functionality concerns, it's WAY too busy. n/t winter is coming Oct 2013 #7

freeperland could`t process a change in the format madrchsod Oct 2013 #8