Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

questionseverything

(9,654 posts)
37. did you see this?
Fri Sep 6, 2013, 01:24 PM
Sep 2013

In an August 2013 article titled “Larry Summers and the Secret ‘End-game’ Memo,” Greg Palast posted evidence of a secret late-1990s plan devised by Wall Street and U.S. Treasury officials to open banking to the lucrative derivatives business. To pull this off required the relaxation of banking regulations not just in the US but globally. The vehicle to be used was the Financial Services Agreement of the World Trade Organization.

The “end-game” would require not just coercing support among WTO members but taking down those countries refusing to join. Some key countries remained holdouts from the WTO, including Iraq, Libya, Iran and Syria. In these Islamic countries, banks are largely state-owned; and “usury” – charging rent for the “use” of money – is viewed as a sin, if not a crime. That puts them at odds with the Western model of rent extraction by private middlemen. Publicly-owned banks are also a threat to the mushrooming derivatives business, since governments with their own banks don’t need interest rate swaps, credit default swaps, or investment-grade ratings by private rating agencies in order to finance their operations.

Bank deregulation proceeded according to plan, and the government-sanctioned and -nurtured derivatives business mushroomed into a $700-plus trillion pyramid scheme. Highly leveraged, completely unregulated, and dangerously unsustainable, it collapsed in 2008 when investment bank Lehman Brothers went bankrupt, taking a large segment of the global economy with it. The countries that managed to escape were those sustained by public banking models outside the international banking net.

These countries were not all Islamic. Forty percent of banks globally are publicly-owned. They are largely in the BRIC countries—Brazil, Russia, India and China—which house forty percent of the global population. They also escaped the 2008 credit crisis, but they at least made a show of conforming to Western banking rules. This was not true of the “rogue” Islamic nations, where usury was forbidden by Islamic teaching. To make the world safe for usury, these rogue states had to be silenced by other means. Having failed to succumb to economic coercion, they wound up in the crosshairs of the powerful US military.

Yup I agree gopiscrap Sep 2013 #1
The phoniness... nikto Sep 2013 #2
I just wonder how much of this war mongering is gopiscrap Sep 2013 #3
I would guess - all of it. Just a little fund raiser. They should offer car washes. eom Blanks Sep 2013 #32
What is it? Like in 5 weeks we run out of money and they get to start their games Autumn Sep 2013 #4
We at least deserve to know where the money will come from. And none of this rhett o rick Sep 2013 #5
K&R. Wish I could rec this 1000 times. kath Sep 2013 #6
AW shucks... nikto Sep 2013 #48
There are times when you read something, Trillo Sep 2013 #7
I'm curious - did you say that two years ago about the Libya intervention? Tx4obama Sep 2013 #8
Libya was BEFORE "The Sequester". bvar22 Sep 2013 #39
Yup. nikto Sep 2013 #49
Remember the GOP Convention with the National Debt Clock in the background Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #9
Triple Rec! tofuandbeer Sep 2013 #10
HUGE K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT Sep 2013 #11
Gen. Dempsey: Syria no-fly zone could cost US $1B per month Catherina Sep 2013 #12
did you see this? questionseverything Sep 2013 #37
I didn't see that but it fits the picture. Catherina Sep 2013 #42
in the following thread questionseverything Sep 2013 #58
Suddenly the Baggers are falling all over each other to raise the Debt Ceiling Snake Plissken Sep 2013 #13
I don't see them backing military action againsy Syria. Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #15
Neither do I. truedelphi Sep 2013 #47
I don't either. The most vocal in the repub party are against action in Syria. (nt) SlimJimmy Sep 2013 #59
Average Syrian looks lighter skinned than average American golfguru Sep 2013 #56
A Syria strike, as contemplated, will have virtually no effect on the debt clock pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #14
You think bombs and war is free now? Really? LOL /nt Dragonfli Sep 2013 #20
I didn't say that, clearly--but you knew that pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #21
I see your point, but I think they low balled even the original estimate, considering that one Dragonfli Sep 2013 #24
Louis... pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #25
Only if you drink Dragonfli Sep 2013 #26
I'll have you know I thrink I can dink with the best of 'em pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #28
Hmm. When i read your post, I thought"Them that don't remember history sure as heck truedelphi Sep 2013 #29
My point was that it's not about the debt clock pinboy3niner Sep 2013 #30
C'mon, at the very least... nikto Sep 2013 #53
We should be told any day now that we will be treated as liberators. Blanks Sep 2013 #33
No effect? You have no way of knowing that. nikto Sep 2013 #51
The only way to change the discussion back to the concerns of the people..... DeSwiss Sep 2013 #16
Masters of War hibbing Sep 2013 #17
. 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #40
My point exactly. nikto Sep 2013 #54
Well one excellent strategy for the GOP would be............ wandy Sep 2013 #18
The Soviet Union collapsed over fiscal credibility, not military credibility markiv Sep 2013 #19
There Really Should Be A Lay Away War grilled onions Sep 2013 #22
According to the war mongers, this war is free! LOL grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #23
Keynes had the right answer .... tax the rich to pay for the war .... and MindMover Sep 2013 #27
100% taxes for everyone who votes for a war dickthegrouch Sep 2013 #36
Boom! K&R Fantastic Anarchist Sep 2013 #31
Money is not the issue treestar Sep 2013 #34
Actually money IS the issue, that the MIC wants MORE & MORE of it. 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #41
we've allowed these type of attacks before noiretextatique Sep 2013 #43
LOL, not it is not! No distraction at all, we don't need another war! n-t Logical Sep 2013 #44
All the money in the world for WAR! workinclasszero Sep 2013 #35
I suspect the GOP will find a sudden interest in paying for this war n2doc Sep 2013 #38
Just a show for the rubes LevelB Sep 2013 #45
And no one better say anything about Iraq anymore either davidn3600 Sep 2013 #46
Yeppers, totally agree! City Lights Sep 2013 #50
Fix this nation before destroying another. xfundy Sep 2013 #52
Luv this cartoon nikto Sep 2013 #55
National Debt? Hey, we profit from war! tecelote Sep 2013 #57
kick woo me with science Sep 2013 #60
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»After the Syrian debate, ...»Reply #37