Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If President Obama wants to send a message against the use of chemical weapons; why doesn't he [View all]Vincardog
(20,234 posts)6. That article presupposes the necessity for the US to do SOMETHING about this alleged use of CW.
Where was that need when Saddam attacked the Kurds with the Chemical weapons Rumsfeld sold him?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
43 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If President Obama wants to send a message against the use of chemical weapons; why doesn't he [View all]
Vincardog
Sep 2013
OP
That article presupposes the necessity for the US to do SOMETHING about this alleged use of CW.
Vincardog
Sep 2013
#6
That misses the point which is "Why are we still manufacturing Chemical Weapons?".
Vincardog
Sep 2013
#11
Now you think Obama was Lying when he told us all he intended to send said "message"?
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#21
LOL, you are becoming most entertaining, keep it up little hawk, you have a place here
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#25
Humanitarian hawking is the best kind, those we kill can sign treaties for instance...
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#27
so as an accused hawk...would I have to have supported every war or not?
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#29
and if wanting the world to eliminate chemical weapons makes me a hawk...so be it...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#30
No, you are doing just fine, hawks need only support the war of the moment and the idea
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#32
Judging by the sheer number of your posts advocating killing (bombs kill they don't spread love)
Dragonfli
Sep 2013
#39
Not advocating killing....Advocating removing the Chemical Weapons from the world...
VanillaRhapsody
Sep 2013
#40
How would Congress be able to pass a law outlaw the manufactoring of chemical weapons in
lumpy
Sep 2013
#19
It didn't help that the British were supplying the chemicals to Syria after the conflict started!
Rosa Luxemburg
Sep 2013
#36