Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
26. The very first reports on the Social media indicated that 'rebels' had attacked
Sun Sep 1, 2013, 11:08 PM
Sep 2013

people with Chemical weapons. I didn't believe it at first as there was no confirmation for about a day or so.

Then the Western Media began its coverage and all of a sudden we 'knew' who had done it. We were even told what the chemical was. How could they have known that unless they were there? The UN cautioned people not to make claims even about what was used until their investigation was complete.

Logic, if there is any anymore, tells me that while Assad isn't any angel, he's also not stupid. He KNEW that the West was just itching to launch an attack and speed things up in Syrian. Their two year backing of the 'rebel's wasn't going very well. Obviously they didn't expect the Syrian people to fight so hard FOR Assad.

Not to mention, we were even hearing from former ANTI Assad Syrians that the 'rebels' were all from outside the country and were killing people and causing untold harm and they were now supporting Assad, at least until the 'rebel's were defeated.

Same thing happened in Libya. So I would be surprised if Assad was that stupid, it would be almost an invitation to the Western powers to launch an attack on Syria.

k&r polichick Sep 2013 #1
I don't know what to think... JackRiddler Sep 2013 #2
And since so many don't know what to think NightWatcher Sep 2013 #4
Oh, there's no need to tell me that. JackRiddler Sep 2013 #6
The very first reports on the Social media indicated that 'rebels' had attacked sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #26
K & R. dipsydoodle Sep 2013 #3
Yes, yes, the story about the rebels who "mishandled" the weapons in 4 different places... Barack_America Sep 2013 #5
Who says al-Qaeda terrorists (your "the rebels") mishandled the CW? delrem Sep 2013 #7
Um, the linked article in the OP?? Barack_America Sep 2013 #8
OP doesn't justify your scoffing. delrem Sep 2013 #12
So if it wasn't Al Queda rebels, who make up a large part now of the 'opposition', who sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #27
The Syrian government. Barack_America Sep 2013 #29
Actually I think logic tells us the opposite. Assad knows that the Western powers sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #31
I think Assad feels confident no one would dare strike over his chemical weapons usage... Barack_America Sep 2013 #32
And no one has seen any convincing evidence that Assad did it. You're wrong about sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #34
Sure, why not? reusrename Sep 2013 #10
I think the pro-war idea is to paint the "rebels" as virtuous freedom fighters, delrem Sep 2013 #15
Again, maybe so, maybe not. cheapdate Sep 2013 #9
You are correct - it is NOT a definitive report. Maedhros Sep 2013 #18
Well, that's more than anyone from the US has done. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #28
It's been a couple of days and no "main stream" reporter has asked Bandar for comment. reusrename Sep 2013 #11
Yeah, that pretty much sums it up. Raksha Sep 2013 #14
Yup. An MSM which wasn't a deliberate accomplice of the MIC would be explaining all this in detail. delrem Sep 2013 #17
The MSM is a propaganda machine, and CNN wonders why it is 'struggling for viewers'. sabrina 1 Sep 2013 #30
I would make a wild guess that hundreds of reports cheapdate Sep 2013 #19
Thank you for posting this story on DU. Raksha Sep 2013 #13
NON-CREDIBLE SOURCE! DEBUNKED! ULTERIOR MOTIVES! sibelian Sep 2013 #16
It's up to the reader to decide how much credibility cheapdate Sep 2013 #20
As opposed to 'highly placed officials' daleo Sep 2013 #21
Not "as opposed to" -- rather "as well as". cheapdate Sep 2013 #23
Or "unnamed Pentagon sources" [n/t] Maedhros Sep 2013 #24
...thence to claim to be authority on the source, presumably. nt sibelian Sep 2013 #35
It wasn't Assad or the Rebels it was… BAT BOY! KittyWampus Sep 2013 #22
You're really upset that there are people against killing Syrians, aren't you? Maedhros Sep 2013 #25
I am against intervening in Syria right now. So I have no idea what your jabbering about. KittyWampus Sep 2013 #33
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»EXCLUSIVE: Syrians In Gho...»Reply #26