General Discussion

cali

(114,904 posts)

30. jaysus, hon. do you have problems reading? try post 18

Reply to Rex (Reply #25)

Mon Aug 5, 2013, 04:43 PM

Aug 2013

what's funny is your science denial. and sad.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

110 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

More on Cannabis cures cancer..... [View all] Bennyboy Aug 2013 OP

more bullshit. Really fucking irresponsible bullshit at that. cali Aug 2013 #1

Hemp seed oil apparently cured a little precancerous skin lesion kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #2

First of all, as I said, marijuana and related products like hemp oil cali Aug 2013 #3

And what makes you an expert??? felix_numinous Aug 2013 #7

I didn't say I was an expert, hon. cali Aug 2013 #8

I have cancer and take it felix_numinous Aug 2013 #10

First of all, I hope things go well for you with the protocol cali Aug 2013 #12

Treatment is a better word felix_numinous Aug 2013 #14

Don't waste your time LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #15

Thanks-- I once had hope felix_numinous Aug 2013 #17

I wouldn't give up hope LordGlenconner Aug 2013 #23

so you're claiming that people who point out that there is no scientific evidence cali Aug 2013 #31

oh, ffs. I am not anti-pot. I use it medicinally for RSD cali Aug 2013 #19

I agree, they are a waste of time. Rex Aug 2013 #22

What's really interesting is this particular anti-pot DUer admits to having some success with kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #42

what's interesting to me is that cali Aug 2013 #52

You obviously didn't bother to read the hundreds of published, peer-reviewed articles kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #41

you clearly haven't read them and don't begin to know how to read even an abstract, cali Aug 2013 #51

Take some time and watch spartan61 Aug 2013 #4

I didn't say there wasn't something to it. Worthy of more research cali Aug 2013 #5

there won't be any clinical reasearch because.... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #79

oh for pity's sake. The U.S. is not the only country that conducts medical research cali Aug 2013 #81

you lost me there... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #82

that's the author of the article in the op. this thread is about the claims he makes cali Aug 2013 #85

ok so ?? wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #87

& one more.... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #80

Glad you know all. n/t BlueToTheBone Aug 2013 #6

Link to your peer-reviewed study? tabasco Aug 2013 #11

not sure what you're asking for here cali Aug 2013 #18

If you did your homework you would know that the THC isn't the most beneficial kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #44

Guzman's studies and one clinical cali Aug 2013 #49

Right? Rex Aug 2013 #25

jaysus, hon. do you have problems reading? try post 18 cali Aug 2013 #30

You can take that "hon" and cram it. n/t leftyladyfrommo Aug 2013 #100

try reading post 18. cali Aug 2013 #103

Which is about as keen and as informed a query as asking for a peer-reviewed study concluding that C LanternWaste Aug 2013 #29

Wow, what a rude thing to say. Rex Aug 2013 #20

It's a fact. And I'm offended by snake oil claims that purport to cure cancer cali Aug 2013 #26

Who's the one here with the anti-science mind frame? Seems like you are, since you are ignoring my kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #45

Reminds me of all the 'cancer cured' claims.. when you read the fine print, it's in mice (again.) X_Digger Aug 2013 #90

exactly. It's either in mice or rats cali Aug 2013 #97

what, no response to actual facts and evidence? cali Aug 2013 #38

Yeah, dude's being a real dick here Bennyboy Aug 2013 #50

Why am I angry? The same reason that all wingnut science deniers make me angry cali Aug 2013 #53

“Natural News” Takes Idiotic to the Next Level cali Aug 2013 #54

The National Cancer Institute says otherwise... Bennyboy Aug 2013 #57

yes. I've read that. Do you understand what pre-clinical means? cali Aug 2013 #62

K&R B Calm Aug 2013 #9

Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Aug 2013 #13

Please be careful when posting stuff like this War Horse Aug 2013 #16

Ignoring science: Not just for wingnuts. cali Aug 2013 #21

We medical people don't use the word "cure" but rarely when it comes to cancer or any other kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #46

no shit sherlock. of course medical personnel and scientists rarely use the word cure re cancer. cali Aug 2013 #65

Great article, despite the anti-pot crowd. Rex Aug 2013 #24

right. I'm anti-pot. so false. cali Aug 2013 #27

You use pot but yet you are anti-pot. Sounds like typical RW "I got mine, screw you" BS. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #73

lol. you're careening from ridiculous to absurd cali Aug 2013 #75

I'm just quoting you. In this thread you proclaimed that you were anti-pot. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #93

more making stuff up. FAIL. where in this thread do I say anything about being anti-pot? cali Aug 2013 #94

I'm pretty sure pro-science does equal anti-pot... LanternWaste Aug 2013 #32

I'm pro-science AND pro-pot. Stick THAT in your pipe and smoke it. kestrel91316 Aug 2013 #47

well one out of two isn't bad. cali Aug 2013 #68

While it may be of benefit to cancer patients, the use of the MineralMan Aug 2013 #28

That article is not just hype. The author is lying by misrepresentation cali Aug 2013 #34

I was attempting to be somewhat polite. MineralMan Aug 2013 #36

sometimes calling it as it is, is important. this is reprehensible stuff cali Aug 2013 #37

My tendency is to discuss things politely. That's how I roll. MineralMan Aug 2013 #106

don't pat yourself too heavily on the back. I've you be plenty snarky cali Aug 2013 #107

Do you? Shall we compare transparency pages, then? MineralMan Aug 2013 #108

Then should I presume that heavy pot smokers don't catch Cancer? 1-Old-Man Aug 2013 #33

Yeah, but that's not from the active ingredients that have been studied or are being used cali Aug 2013 #35

So much for my critical thinking skills ... as if I'm going to believe hemp oil cures cancer ..> YOHABLO Aug 2013 #39

Like this? RandiFan1290 Aug 2013 #43

For any of the doubters... AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #40

I'm familiar with those studies: yes there are preliminary studies indicating that cannibinoids may cali Aug 2013 #55

The Federal Government has discouraged studies of Marijuana because of the war on drugs AZ Progressive Aug 2013 #59

there are studies elsewhere in the world. Great Britain, Spain cali Aug 2013 #72

I think pro-legalization people are extremely disingenuous about medicinal properties Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #48

"...just want to get high...???" CanSocDem Aug 2013 #58

"This alone should reduce the number of cancer cases." - Probably one of the dumber claims in here. Gravitycollapse Aug 2013 #60

You mean I can avoid cancer by having more choice of drugs? Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #61

I don't believe that. I think there are any number of people who actually buy into quackery cali Aug 2013 #78

Mark Sircus: QUACK, QUACK, QUACK cali Aug 2013 #56

I think his OMD syands for "Orchestral Manoeuvers in the Dark" Dreamer Tatum Aug 2013 #63

or "Only Make Deposits"- as in his bank account cali Aug 2013 #67

I saw OMD live in 1985 or 1986... SidDithers Aug 2013 #70

Cancer is not one disease... SidDithers Aug 2013 #64

quackery and nothing but quackery in the article. cali Aug 2013 #66

Your sigline couldn't be more appropriate here... SidDithers Aug 2013 #69

honestly, I find it truly disturbing that people here are calling this a great article cali Aug 2013 #71

Yep. Zoeisright Aug 2013 #92

"Dr. Mark Sircus, Ac., OMD, DM (P) (acupuncturist, doctor of oriental and pastoral medicine)" sagat Aug 2013 #74

Amazing that so many people are so stupid or gullible that they cite this guy cali Aug 2013 #76

the asshole quack also claims baking soda and maple syrup cure cancer cali Aug 2013 #77

it has been shown in studies to help fight cancer, but wonder cure my ass. dionysus Aug 2013 #83

actually, it's been shown to have some efficacy in some studies in mice and rats cali Aug 2013 #84

i know. i find it's peddled most by the "i wanna be able to smoke a joint walking down the street" dionysus Aug 2013 #86

apparently smoking it..... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #88

there have been no studies or clinical trials with humans on the efficacy of cali Aug 2013 #96

and there won't be! nt wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #98

yes, there will. In Spain, there's already been a THC trial cali Aug 2013 #101

tell me how big pharma can cash in.... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #104

seriously? because it's more than likely that effective treatment cali Aug 2013 #105

thank you for..... wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #110

Synthetic cannabinoid receptor agonists inhibit tumor growth and metastasis of breast cancer. wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #89

you realize those are preliminary studies, right? Not human trials. cali Aug 2013 #95

a human trial: wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #99

that's encouraging and interesting. what it isn't is trial. cali Aug 2013 #102

& k & r. eom. wildbilln864 Aug 2013 #91

Great info! BuddhaGirl Aug 2013 #109