Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: California Mathematicians Develop Equation to Prevent Shootings [View all]geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)5. Interesting approach.
The model suggests that the rate of firearm-induced homicides can be
minimized either by a ban of private firearm possession, or by
the legal availability of guns for everyone, depending on the
parameter values. While there is strong indication that the model
assumptions and hence the properties are consistent with data, it
will be important to collect more data to back up the underlying
assumptions more strongly.
Dependence of the Firearm-Related Homicide Rate on Gun Availability: A Mathematical Analysis
Interesting conclusion.
Seems like they went to a lot of trouble to develop a mathematical model that spews out the positions of the two polar opposites in the gun control debate.
Tits on a bull as they say.
And your OP subject line is misleading - the model was NOT developed to prevent shootings.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
What's with this "you people"? Let's quit personalizing these debates & return to facts. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#13
Just going by what the authors state. You are welcome to your own interpretations.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#19
You are wrong. I link directly to the pdf of the study and quote directly from the conclusions.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#37
"An armed society is a polite society." [...] widespread free mental health care
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#12
The study suggest justification for more guns- and no guns. They get to have it both ways.
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#21
I discussed the facts of the results of the study and used that as a point of departure.
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#26
Guns are a problem, but people are a bigger problem. Progressive solutions solve the bigger problem
Bernardo de La Paz
Jul 2013
#30
Will the GOP legislatures make it illegal for math teachers to talk about crime or trauma...
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#6
Ohio's forensic topic was "crime" when I was a high school junior on the debate team
Kolesar
Jul 2013
#11
It is sketchy. And inconclusive. The op climbs out on limb and tries to pass it off
geckosfeet
Jul 2013
#38
Gun ownership is up, concealed carry is way up, gun accidents and gun homicides are down.
GreenStormCloud
Jul 2013
#35
We weren't supposed to notice either the "guns for all" option or the altered title.
friendly_iconoclast
Jul 2013
#44
Critics will immediately zero in on the mathematicians' foreign sounding names.
Quantess
Jul 2013
#46