HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Experts Say Iran Attack I...

Tue Feb 21, 2012, 01:21 PM

Experts Say Iran Attack Is Irrational, Yet Hawks Are Winning the Debate [View all]

From the chairman of the Joint Chiefs to the head of Mossad, the experts are speaking out against attacking Iran over its nuclear program, but hawks like the GOP presidential candidates are drowning out the warnings.

by Peter Beinart Feb 21, 2012 4:45 AM EST

The debate over whether Israel should attack Iran rests on three basic questions. First, if Iran’s leaders got the bomb, would they use it or give it to people who might? Second, would a strike substantially retard Iran’s nuclear program? Third, if Israel attacks, what will Iran do in response?
Mideast Iran Nuclear

The vast majority of people opining on these questions—myself very much included—lack the expertise to answer. We’ve never directed a bombing campaign; we have no secret sources in Tehran; we don’t spend our days studying the Iranian regime. So essentially, we decide which experts to trust.

As it happens, both the American and Israeli governments boast military and intelligence agencies charged with answering exactly these sorts of questions. And with striking consistency, the people who run, or ran, those agencies are warning—loudly—against an attack.



10 replies, 1649 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 10 replies Author Time Post
Reply Experts Say Iran Attack Is Irrational, Yet Hawks Are Winning the Debate [View all]
Purveyor Feb 2012 OP
Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #1
DCKit Feb 2012 #2
gratuitous Feb 2012 #3
Proud Liberal Dem Feb 2012 #4
Octafish Feb 2012 #5
woo me with science Feb 2012 #6
flexnor Feb 2012 #7
flexnor Feb 2012 #8
Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2012 #9
FogerRox Feb 2012 #10