Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
18. "Half of America is in poverty, and its creeping toward 75%"
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 05:53 PM
Jul 2013
Half of America is in poverty, and its creeping toward 75%
http://www.alternet.org/economy/real-numbers-half-america-poverty-and-its-creeping-toward-75-0

If you click on the first link, it takes you to the following Census data:

The data presented here are from the Current Population Survey (CPS), 2012 Annual Social and Economic Supplement (ASEC), the source of official poverty estimates. The CPS ASEC is a sample survey of approximately 100,000 household nationwide. These data reflect conditions in calendar year 2011.

  • In 2011, the official poverty rate was 15.0 percent. There were 46.2 million people in poverty.

  • After 3 consecutive years of increases, neither the official poverty rate nor the number of people in poverty were statisti¬cally different from the 2010 estimates1

  • The 2011 poverty rates for most demographic groups examined were not statistically different from their 2010 rates. Poverty rates were lower in 2011 than in 2010 for six groups: Hispanics, males, the foreign-born, nonciti¬zens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropol¬itan statistical areas but outside principal cities. Poverty rates went up between 2010 and 2011 for naturalized citizens.

  • For most groups, the number of people in poverty either decreased or did not show a statistically significant change. The number of people in poverty decreased for noncitizens, people living in the South, and people living inside metropolitan statistical areas but outside principal cities between 2010 and 2011. The number of naturalized citizens in poverty increased.

  • The poverty rate in 2011 for chil¬dren under age 18 was 21.9 per-cent. The poverty rate for people aged 18 to 64 was 13.7 percent, while the rate for people aged 65 and older was 8.7 percent. None of the rates for these age groups were statistically different from their 2010 estimates.2
http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/poverty/about/overview/


Go to the "Publications" tab for more information.

Income, Poverty and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2011
http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html

Sex

  • The poverty rate for males decreased between 2010 and 2011, from 14.0 percent to 13.6 percent, while the poverty rate for females was 16.3 percent, not statistically different from the 2010 estimate.
<...>

Health Insurance Coverage

  • The number of people with health insurance increased to 260.2 million in 2011 from 256.6 million in 2010, as did the percentage of people with health insurance (84.3 percent in 2011, 83.7 percent in 2010).

  • The percentage of people covered by private health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 63.9 percent. This was the first time in the last 10 years that the rate of private health insurance coverage has not decreased. The percentage covered by employment-based health insurance in 2011 was not statistically different from 2010, at 55.1 percent.

  • The percentage of people covered by government health insurance increased from 31.2 percent to 32.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid increased from 15.8 percent in 2010 to 16.5 percent in 2011. The percentage covered by Medicare also rose over the period, from 14.6 percent to 15.2 percent. The percentage covered by Medicaid in 2011 was higher than the percentage covered by Medicare.

  • In 2011, 9.7 percent of children under 19 (7.6 million) were without health insurance. Neither estimate is significantly different from the corresponding 2010 estimate. The uninsured rate also remained statistically unchanged for those age 26 to 34 and people age 45 to 64. It declined, however, for people age 19 to 25, age 35 to 44 and those age 65 and older.

  • The uninsured rate for children in poverty (13.8 percent) was higher than the rate for all children (9.4 percent).

  • In 2011, the uninsured rates decreased as household income increased from 25.4 percent for those in households with annual income less than $25,000 to 7.8 percent in households with income of $75,000 or more.

    <...>
- more -

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/income_wealth/cb12-172.html

Dire information, but I would say a decrease in the poverty rate among most groups between 2010 and 2011 is big news, as is the information on health insurance coverage.



America's race to the bottom ohheckyeah Jul 2013 #1
They're starving us out Hydra Jul 2013 #2
stay alive, be ready for the revolution PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #3
If things don't change, you will be proven right. nt bluestate10 Jul 2013 #6
I feel this coming Saviolo Jul 2013 #55
It IS heart-breaking. One more statistic, one in six US children go to bed hungry every sabrina 1 Jul 2013 #4
Sabrina, one big problem is that poor people don't vote regularly. Real change won't bluestate10 Jul 2013 #8
Why should they? leftstreet Jul 2013 #15
Politicians only represent the wealthy. nt awoke_in_2003 Jul 2013 #23
Then protest vote. Write someone in... anything. n/t cprise Jul 2013 #53
I not only voted for Obama, I worked to get him elected and things are still getting rhett o rick Jul 2013 #65
You seriously think "voting" will solve anything? 99Forever Jul 2013 #31
You can write-in anyone you want cprise Jul 2013 #54
You misinterpreted what I was saying. 99Forever Jul 2013 #56
I see what you're saying cprise Jul 2013 #60
write in votes are not permitted Coyote_Bandit Jul 2013 #58
You'd have to find some other mark to protest, then. cprise Jul 2013 #61
unless there is a hand recount Coyote_Bandit Jul 2013 #68
They will see a descrepency between turnout/number of ballots cprise Jul 2013 #81
The problem is much bigger than that. The media is propagandizing us, many that want to vote are rhett o rick Jul 2013 #64
The poor face many obstacles to voting YoungDemCA Jul 2013 #73
Sabrina, not meaning to dismiss the severity of food insecurity (hunger) in the HardTimes99 Jul 2013 #71
The minimum wage has to be increased to a level that single people and families can bluestate10 Jul 2013 #5
"These things ^ do NOT happen by accident." woo me with science Jul 2013 #7
This is the "new era" Obama wants. forestpath Jul 2013 #9
No one that has the power to do anything about it genuinely cares to make it better. HughBeaumont Jul 2013 #10
They're also making it impossible to work multiple jobs Patiod Jul 2013 #11
It's the stockholders more than the CEOs jmowreader Jul 2013 #19
This is so fucking heartless it makes me seethe. CrispyQ Jul 2013 #44
Things are so bad, that Obama is making "Working Class" themed speeches... Junkdrawer Jul 2013 #12
"This trend is also unsustainable." Be optimistic. Sure it is. n/t jtuck004 Jul 2013 #13
But life is grand if you're at the top and sticking it to everyone else Catherina Jul 2013 #14
DURec leftstreet Jul 2013 #16
Daily CEO Pay Now Exceeds the Average Worker's Annual Salary – Roy Rolling Jul 2013 #17
cannibals is a good word for what they are. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #40
"Half of America is in poverty, and its creeping toward 75%" ProSense Jul 2013 #18
Thanks for posting this. n/t zeos3 Jul 2013 #26
The "poverty line" as currently determined is out of date and woefully underestimates poverty. snot Jul 2013 #46
Your first ProSense Jul 2013 #52
The president will help us with the TPP! Enthusiast Jul 2013 #57
It depends on how you define poverty. blackspade Jul 2013 #69
Some people insist that America's Poor, the Working Poor, and the Soon to be Poor bvar22 Jul 2013 #75
Roger that! blackspade Jul 2013 #79
The only way to fight back is with a Union. The politicians and their owners do not care about you. Skeeter Barnes Jul 2013 #20
Which is EXACTLY why unions are under attack! n/t AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #22
exactly. We need another labor movement. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #39
I just got a nasty piece of news this afternoon. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #21
I am so sorry to hear that. Democrats cannot ignore the wage problem anymore. There are just too liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #38
My contact person has been with the company for 20+ years. AngryOldDem Jul 2013 #72
Yep... FloriTexan Jul 2013 #24
Thanks for the info. zeos3 Jul 2013 #25
Here's a further irony: chervilant Jul 2013 #48
Bang. Spot on. MannyGoldstein Jul 2013 #27
Bare in mind 9.5 making 500K will soon be worth twice that and twice again soon after SleeplessinSoCal Jul 2013 #28
Thanlk You, Thank You, Thank You Phlem Jul 2013 #29
Post removed Post removed Jul 2013 #30
Are YOU going to Take ON the US Government with a pistol? bvar22 Jul 2013 #35
Thank you for saying that DonCoquixote Jul 2013 #51
kr HiPointDem Jul 2013 #32
k&r Starry Messenger Jul 2013 #33
Excellent post. K&R nt TBF Jul 2013 #34
Congress needs to raise the minimum wage to about 11 bucks an hour arely staircase Jul 2013 #36
I'm tired of Congress' action on minimum wage. Raising minimum wage just isn't enough anymore. liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #37
agreed that 11 bucks isn't enough to live off arely staircase Jul 2013 #41
Corporations are desperately trying to make the minimum wage the standard wage PowerToThePeople Jul 2013 #42
Nixon proposed a guaranteed annual income. CrispyQ Jul 2013 #43
An array of price-control regulations are also needed. reformist2 Jul 2013 #45
The thing is they raise the minimum wage, companies will merely hire part-time duffyduff Jul 2013 #83
By design, my friend, by design. Fantastic Anarchist Jul 2013 #47
Very very very SAD .... MindMover Jul 2013 #49
Thank you chervilant Jul 2013 #50
Perhaps Elysium really is our future. Can I be Matt Damon? Kennah Jul 2013 #59
Every time there's a crash, the same few grab more. DirkGently Jul 2013 #62
Because free trader wall street thieves are heroes in America? workinclasszero Jul 2013 #63
30 plus years of trickle down and I haven't seen a drop of it. progressoid Jul 2013 #66
what I want to know is if we now know it doesn't work why can't we change it? liberal_at_heart Jul 2013 #67
Because the elites who believe in it and profited from it control both political parties. n/t duffyduff Jul 2013 #84
Awesome post. blackspade Jul 2013 #70
Kicked and recommended. YoungDemCA Jul 2013 #74
And Obama has been fiddling for 5-1/2 years, while the U.S. burns. One of his solutions is to screw MotherPetrie Jul 2013 #76
Glug Glug DJ13 Jul 2013 #77
You should re-post this as its own thread. Egalitarian Thug Jul 2013 #78
Thread winner.... blackspade Jul 2013 #80
K&R! We need big changes. nt limpyhobbler Jul 2013 #82
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Downward Trend for Am...»Reply #18