Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: This is Greenwald's debunk of his support for the Iraq war? [View all]BlueCaliDem
(15,438 posts)64. Exactly! It was also in one of my posts, pointing out that fact
but I got angry responses before it was hidden, using a weak argument that I was a "homophobe" because the GeeGee coven just decided I was based on their own opinion.
However, one response was fairly quick before the GeeGee Clan decided to alert and almost hide the post:
Actually he was 'for' Obama, but don't let that stop you, you're on a roll.
As another poster rightfully pointed out, there's NO evidence whatsoever that GeeGee was "for" Obama. But ample evidence he was FOR Bush - something that poster, of course, wouldn't address. Is it then so hard for a rational person to believe that he was NOT for President Obama? Especially after his FireDogLake-style of attacking the president instead of Republicans?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
199 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
Translation: I was for it before I was against it and I was absolutely NEVER for it.
ucrdem
Jun 2013
#1
Kind of like, "I never took a dime from CATO and I made much more money working for the ACLU."
ucrdem
Jun 2013
#3
Yeah, about those phone calls.. You're still in the ignorant hole you've always been in. nm
Cha
Jun 2013
#183
So you're questioning Greenwald for doing exactly what the Democratic party did?
burnodo
Jun 2013
#7
Gee Gee's problem isn't that he was hornswaggled, it's that he denigrates others who were
MADem
Jun 2013
#45
Attacking the messenger, again with distortions of his actual positions, because you don't like MSG
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#8
That is all you ever got... lame, childish 'mock' to try and shut down discussion
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#50
I disagree. Trying to claim that he supports, Bush, the Iraq war, the Carlye group, is deciteful
usGovOwesUs3Trillion
Jun 2013
#101
Indeed...the hypocrite who is flinging shit here is Greenwald. That's what's bugging some!
MADem
Jun 2013
#55
Do you oppose the mass surveillance of ordinary people by government agencies?
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#79
So your position is that nothing like a massive surveillance of the American people
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#146
Some of my confusion has to do with certain ambiguities in your replies.
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#172
So you are refusing to answer this simple question in order to keep your thread kicked?
Warren Stupidity
Jun 2013
#178
No actually in that post she claimed there was no massive domestic surveillance
Warren Stupidity
Jul 2013
#191
Here's my favorite GREENWALDism from the same link, which I will use on his fans who call names
UTUSN
Jun 2013
#83
jesus christ prosense half the clowns in this admin you adore supported the iraq war. nt
boilerbabe
Jun 2013
#134
Greenwald, through his early support for Bush as many Americans were after 9/11, did less
AnotherMcIntosh
Jun 2013
#159
Glenn "The Lyin Libertarian" Greedwald praised the Citizens United decision...
Galraedia
Jun 2013
#162