Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Journalistic impartiality tested in NSA leak story [View all]OilemFirchen
(7,143 posts)30. I didn't omit shit.
Lapham is a journalist. I respect him. He is more mainstream than Glenn Greenwald, who was the subject of the discussion.
Here's another: Ernest Hemingway.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
55 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
You have provided a perfect example of what the article is saying. Both Clemons and Greenwald
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#7
I don't have anyone on ignore, I love debate, even more with those who 'can't get anything left'.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#14
Not to mention Greenwald character assassinates anyone who disagrees with him.
JaneyVee
Jun 2013
#31
Most of those you mentioned are either dead or they are not who the general public get their
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#39
Dragging up an old legal case again? I haven't clicked, but is that the one where the judge
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#12
"The magistrate judge granted both motions, finding defense counsel's conduct unethical under two"
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#32
Funny that the judge ruled that his actions were not unethical but you claim that he was...
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#17
Thank you again. Disgusting attempt to smear a man because of a political disagreement.
sabrina 1
Jun 2013
#23
"The magistrate judge granted both motions, finding defense counsel's conduct unethical under two"
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#33
You can weasel your way all around it but the judge's words are clear. As for your "A 52-page
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#34
Mr. Greenwald and I are also quoting the ruling. And I asked for a link to the originial case the
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#42
I gave you the cite. Kindly read what you are opining on. Heck...I even gave you an online
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#45
I've given you the citation. I also gave you an online resource. Why haven't you read the case
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#46
I have read the contents of your link. It has nothing about a 52-page transcript...
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#47
You provide a cititation but can provide no link to assess the veracity. Nice racket
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#49
Let me see if I have this correctly...you are unable to access the cases you opine on?
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#50
You gave me the link to the appeal. Can you or can you not give me a link to the original case.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#51
If you have the cite, look it up! Don't know how to do that? Then perhaps you
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#52
Congratulations on parroting a Little Green Footballs comment TO THE LETTER.
Luminous Animal
Jun 2013
#53
Look at the dates--LGF and Crooks and Liars copied me. LGF links to my OP on DU.
msanthrope
Jun 2013
#54
News is what somebody somewhere wants to suppress; all the rest is advertising. Lord Northcliffe
Tierra_y_Libertad
Jun 2013
#41