Eugene Robinson on PRISM [View all]
Whenever there's a complicated issue, I turn to Eugene Robinson for an explanation. Over the years, he's impressed me as the most thoughtful and level-headed political writer out there. His take on the issue:
In the coming debate, someone should explain why a mid-level computer guy working for a private contractor had access to so many of the NSAs most closely held secrets. Someone should explain why the intelligence court is evidently so compliant. Someone should explain perhaps in French, German and Spanish why our allies e-mails are fair game for the agencys prying eyes.
But heres the big issue: The NSA, it now seems clear, is assembling an unimaginably vast trove of communications data, and the bigger it gets, the more useful it is in enabling analysts to make predictions. Its one thing if the NSA looks for patterns in the data that suggest a nascent overseas terrorist group or an imminent attack. Its another thing altogether if the agency observes, say, patterns that suggest the birth of the next tea party or Occupy Wall Street movement.
Is that paranoia? Then reassure me. Lets talk about the big picture and decide, as citizens, whether we are comfortable with the direction our intelligence agencies are heading. And lets remember that it was Snowden, not our elected officials, who opened this vital conversation.
Read the whole op-ed
here.