Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Curious: do people think phone calls and emails route themselves... [View all]DCBob
(24,689 posts)22. Are there some new restrictions posting comments now?
Last edited Sun Jun 9, 2013, 04:57 PM - Edit history (1)
Also, it is my understanding the government is not "opening the package" unless there is some legitimate reason.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Curious: do people think phone calls and emails route themselves... [View all]
Recursion
Jun 2013
OP
Do we expect it to collected, catalogued, and stored in databases for later retrieval?
woo me with science
Jun 2013
#13
There are certainly arguable justifications, but I'm not sure a database full of "just in case" info
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2013
#31
Reminds me, why don't gun owners want anyone to know? Whereas when one has alarms, they have neon
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#26
so do alarms. No, there must be some reason gun holders want to hide the fact because
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#36
Alarms says something is in house people would protect. Same with guns.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#42
And what type of bigger picture info could an ambitious law enforcement officer infer from a phone
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2013
#34
Does anyone here think this is a Democrat created issue? The Patriot Act was passed in 2006 by
Thinkingabout
Jun 2013
#9
The 10 Senators who voted No on reauthorization were all Democrats, along with about 130 in
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#17
We expect the phone companies, whose service we pay for, to protect our privacy.
backscatter712
Jun 2013
#11
Does knowing that UPS boxes do not deliver themselves mean the driver is expected to have opened
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#14
There is a detailed record of a every package that is sent via UPS and by other shippers.
DCBob
Jun 2013
#18
Yes. But you did not answer my question, and you are not the OP either. Tag team non sequiters?
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#20
No, feel free to take the part the OP can not take. But you have to comprhend that I was speaking to
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#38
UPS does not hold the power to imprison me or to legally commit violence against me. nt
Ed Suspicious
Jun 2013
#37
I know that the USPS asks what is inside a package, and lying is a federal offense
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#27
Yes, they ask is there anything dangerous or liquid in the package and you have to tell them.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#41
So you admit they do not ask 'what's in the box', they if it's dangerous. To protect their workers.
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#44
Do people think their dinner gets to the table by itself, without a waiter?
Bluenorthwest
Jun 2013
#16
On that, I do think it's funny that people who are paranoid about their credit cards online...
Recursion
Jun 2013
#25
The act of spying on everyone is used to control a populace. It's a McFucking.
DisgustipatedinCA
Jun 2013
#29
They are not doing that. It is a wide speculation to reach for that answer.
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#32
as is this whole issue. IT's like Seinfeld, a show about nothing. So is this issue. It's nothing but
graham4anything
Jun 2013
#43