Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: That hopey changey thing at the Department of Justice [View all]DevonRex
(22,541 posts)30. That is a BIZARRE and INSULTING reply. Deliberately so.
I gave lots of great things Obama/Holder/DOJ did regarding DOMA and Prop 8 by extension and the far-reaching effects on other issues. The only thing I said regarding your post was:
"This is HARDLY the kind of thing Justice Scalia would do. No one who thinks as Scalia thinks could ever turn around and do the things I've noted above. It wasn't until the right cases came up in the right venue that level of scrutiny could be addressed."
That is NOT lying about what you said. And it will be a cold day in hell before I apologize for something I did not do.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
47 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
It figures you'd dig up a ridiculously hyperbolic and debunked five-year-old opinion to post. n/t
ProSense
Jun 2013
#29
Hyperbolic headings in the piece are disproved immediately by quoted passages.
DevonRex
Jun 2013
#31