Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: T.E.A. Party = Taxed Enough Already. Doesn't it make sense that the IRS should look into them? [View all]markpkessinger
(8,395 posts)25. Advocating politically for lower taxes cannot, and should not, be assumed . . .
. . . to be in any way necessarily indicative of likely tax evasion. To do so would have a chilling effect on political discourse. No matter how much we may disagree with Tea Party groups and the positions they hold, this is simply wrong.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
46 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
T.E.A. Party = Taxed Enough Already. Doesn't it make sense that the IRS should look into them? [View all]
grahamhgreen
May 2013
OP
It's against the law, apparently, to target a particular group of organizations
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#1
Okay, you're splitting hairs. Let's use "non-Democrats" or "non-liberals." It's political. nt
Honeycombe8
May 2013
#21
Well, if you are looking for criminals, as is the IRS's job. AND their criminality is defined by
grahamhgreen
May 2013
#23
Advocating politically for lower taxes cannot, and should not, be assumed . . .
markpkessinger
May 2013
#25
Well, when you apply for tax breaks in order to finance your efforts to get tax breaks, you'd think
patrice
May 2013
#5
I don't want to live in a world where one comes under government suspicion for words they SAY.
cherokeeprogressive
May 2013
#7
It's not just what they say, they are actively trying to not pay their taxes. If these groups
grahamhgreen
May 2013
#24
Yes it does, sometimes it's simple, a cigar is just a cigar and a tax evader is just a tax evader
Dragonfli
May 2013
#8
The simplest Answer is Often the Best! "If it walks like a duck, sounds like a duck..It's a Duck!
KoKo
May 2013
#36
It's a different situation. The problem here is how do you define a "social welfare"
CTyankee
May 2013
#29
The "logic" in the OP is dangerous, unethical and completely unnecessary.
Gravitycollapse
May 2013
#14
Only if they look at an equal number of dirty librul groups, even if there are only 1/10th as many.
corkhead
May 2013
#20
What about the mafia? Or any group that is stating an intention to break the law.
grahamhgreen
May 2013
#33
Thank you. IMHO, they are groups organized of, by, and for, tax cheats!!!!!!
grahamhgreen
May 2013
#43
No. What you are saying is that IRS harassment based on an opinion about taxes is OK
badtoworse
May 2013
#46