Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Just because I KNOW somebody will copy and paste [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)17. I don't understand why you feel targeted. You made a comment on a subject that was
pretty much beaten to death here and I responded to your comment as I felt you were asking for better standards, but left out the behavior of some DUers who basically derailed a thread where those standards could have been discussed in a more productive way.
People respond to my comments all the time, sometimes not very politely to say the least but I don't feel particularly targeted. It's a discussion board, if I make a comment I expect responses, both good and bad.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
97 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Hopefully people would be more polite next time when a story seems questionable.
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#6
Actually I wasn't talking about you. Just pointing out that there are others who
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#8
I addressed your comment because you failed to note the behavior of others in Nadin's
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#12
I don't understand why you feel targeted. You made a comment on a subject that was
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#17
Taking you to task? A comment on an internet blog is not taking someone to task. It is
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#30
Actually, her getting the last word, MM, would necessitate you shutting your trap. nt
Bonobo
Feb 2012
#71
I thought it was instructive to see the assumption that having the last word is would be
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#93
MM, I just want you to know that we all saw what was posted and you are 100% correct
Number23
Feb 2012
#55
Can you point where I do not hold myself to those standards? I am always willing to
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#45
Interesting, thank you. Another interesting aspect of online bullying, which came up
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#50
There is a big difference between disinformation, which is a deliberate attempt to
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#67
The call was for an end to bullying. I don't think that was meant to be a deflection of anything,
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#87
Thank you....missed the original thread and could make absolutely no sense of this thread
Rowdyboy
Feb 2012
#53
Excellent post, thank you. The notion that there are any journalistic standards
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#54
I think the news wire in general, the dry, classic reporting, is still decent.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#79
Oh I wouldn't worry about that. Our 'journalists' who reported totally false imformation
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#41
As a freelance reporter, I can only hope you get yourself some training and an editor who knows what
Brickbat
Feb 2012
#14
I would disagree, I would say you have more to worry about from our so-called
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#47
You're still WAAAY more reputable than Drudge, Fox, Redstate. And WAAAY more classy.
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#33
True, but citizen journalists wouldn't link to a news source usually because...
FarLeftFist
Feb 2012
#39
True, and thank you for pointing that out. Could also be said about the more 'respectable'
sabrina 1
Feb 2012
#44
Handling a mistake with grace says more than making a mistake. We all make mistakes
Bluenorthwest
Feb 2012
#38