Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: None Dare Call It Treason: O'Connor has forfeited the right to be respected [View all]Canuckistanian
(42,290 posts)9. What's most telling to me
Is that they embedded a warning that this judgement was not to be used as precedent, which, in itself was precedent.
It's like they acknowledged that their opinions couldn't stand up to rigorous legal scrutiny.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
61 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
![](du4img/smicon-reply-new.gif)
None Dare Call It Treason: O'Connor has forfeited the right to be respected [View all]
kpete
Apr 2013
OP
And then the media HID the egg-throwing, furious protests at the inauguration of the
tblue37
Apr 2013
#47
I would have said the rise of Reagan via the Iran-Contra affair was the first contemporary coup
davekriss
Apr 2013
#60
They call it "loyalty",...to Party, to Reagan, to God. (Who is a Capitalist)
Spitfire of ATJ
Apr 2013
#37
O'Connor and the rest of the courtesans should go down as mass murderers with that decision.
freshwest
Apr 2013
#8
It's not overdramatic at all. It's what happened, and what was the inevitable result.
calimary
Apr 2013
#54
I don't believe it was a mistake at all. I believe it was deliberate crime. If SHE made a 'mistake'
sabrina 1
Apr 2013
#21
I think she made a mistake if intentionally doing something illegal can be considered a mistake.
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#49