Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: WHOOMP, there it is. [View all]PeaceNikki
(27,985 posts)26. blah, blah, blah. I won't hold WI Democratic candidates responsible for this.
Democratic apathy got us Scott Walker, Ron Johnson, gerrymandering which will hurt for a decade, and lost us Feingold. I like WI Democrats very much and will support them.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
151 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Keep on doing what you've been doing, you're going to keep on getting what you're getting,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#3
The people who are about to endorse or reject his proposed SS cut are running again.
Marr
Apr 2013
#11
Now the Democratic Congress-Critters have to decide if they are going to run
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#21
blah, blah, blah. I won't hold WI Democratic candidates responsible for this.
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#26
Did we change the subject when I wasnt looking? Doesnt matter. You have nothing but rudeness (blah,
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#32
Your inability to read my other posts in this thread is what's short-sighted. Spare me your total BS
PeaceNikki
Apr 2013
#117
No, the OP wants the Democratic party to fucking sit up and pay attention to us,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#22
Your response smacks of desperation. You cant defend why the Pres proposed cutting SS so you are
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#28
So your response is "whatever"? Add that to your "bullshit" responses. You dont seem to have
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#36
You say that those that do not believe as you are fools. I guess there is no reason to discuss
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#136
a deeper problem is, losing elections has no real adverse consequences for dem party
KG
Apr 2013
#10
Oh, I think that if there was a massive loss of support, it would make a huge difference.
MadHound
Apr 2013
#15
It would take eight years, probably much less, given history and political realities
MadHound
Apr 2013
#78
I am proposing that we hold our party, our politicians responsible for their actions.
MadHound
Apr 2013
#44
Actually, what was posted is readily available for anyone to see. Your statement that
AnotherMcIntosh
Apr 2013
#53
And yet Obama has signed a midnight deal with Kharzi to keep troops in Afghanistan through 2024,
MadHound
Apr 2013
#51
Sorry, I stopped reading at "party uber alles". Have never found hyperbole like this a benefit
pinto
Apr 2013
#58
Yep, dividing the Democratic Party by forming a third party is a GREAT idea!....
OldDem2012
Apr 2013
#61
Not one. Not a single suggestion of how to realistically achieve this in a given time period.
cali
Apr 2013
#88
You mean as opposed to the people who would sacrifice the poor, disabled and elderly...
MindPilot
Apr 2013
#92
No. I don't. Now do tell who you sacrifice, how long it will take and what the plan is
cali
Apr 2013
#93
yes, I can see you have no grasp of the complexities. that, honeypie, is abundantly clear.
cali
Apr 2013
#112
Nice deflection. No, Ms. Thug has been here since nearly the beginning, about the same time as you.
Egalitarian Thug
Apr 2013
#115
So, hand the keys over to the cons, shills, vultures, christianists and batshit loons?
VOX
Apr 2013
#98
Your right, we all should be giving the rich and wealthy a lot more to worry about
nolabels
Apr 2013
#135
I might love to see 20 years of nothing but Republican rule and policies....
SamReynolds
Apr 2013
#133
IF this ever comes to a vote (which I doubt), why don't we see how each Dem votes?
gateley
Apr 2013
#143