Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Why I Wouldn't Vote for Hillary if She Ran in 2016... [View all]rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)39. But your question insinuates that the OP is blaming Sen Clinton for what her husband did.
The OP does do that, therefore your question is a strawman argument. No one is blaming women for the choices their husbands make.
Some here think that asking questions relives them from responsibility of what they are implying. It's a technique commonly used by Faux.
Dont be afraid to state where you stand. If you dont like the OP, come right out and say it.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
67 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If she decides to run and is our nominee Good luck finding another discussion board to drown your
William769
Apr 2013
#11
I have absolutely no idea WTF you're talking about. Your posts are bizarre. Cheer up.
JaneyVee
Apr 2013
#30
your response to the OP was " Now we're blaming women for choices their husbands make?"
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#33
Why do I have to present an argument in defense of her? I'm asking a question!
JaneyVee
Apr 2013
#37
But your question insinuates that the OP is blaming Sen Clinton for what her husband did.
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#39
The OP is implying that he wouldn't vote for Hillary because of a law her husband signed.
JaneyVee
Apr 2013
#40
I hope you mean in the Primary. An if so, who's your alternative who Will run. nt
onehandle
Apr 2013
#16
Hillary sold out the American worker -- she touts the "advantages" of outsourcing US jobs
antigop
Apr 2013
#19
The OP isn't about Krugman -- it's about DLC Hillary. Krugman didn't co-found the Senate India
antigop
Apr 2013
#41
My post was about outsourcing of US jobs...which Hillary touted the "advantages " of last year
antigop
Apr 2013
#49
This isn't about Krugman...it's about DLC Hillary. The OP mentioned why he/she would not support
antigop
Apr 2013
#55
Distraction, "hey look at Krugman." The question is, do you support Sec Clinton's
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#45
Yes, it's a distraction and there HAVE been politicians who have railed against "free trade" nt
antigop
Apr 2013
#50
Hillary sold out the tech community by supporting an increase in the h1-b visa limit
antigop
Apr 2013
#21
I said before that I would never vote again for a DLC-tainted, New Dem, Third Way, or Blue Dog again
Fuddnik
Apr 2013
#31
Sec Clinton has always represented the 1%. That's why I hope she doesnt win
rhett o rick
Apr 2013
#34