Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Women in shorts cause car to “crash” into pole [View all]geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)24. I wish I could say I was surprised.
But, this site has become a safe haven for this type of creep--see juror comment #2.
I can trace it to when at least two men talked about how they've committed rapes in the past, and got pats on the back instead of PPRs.
What rape culture?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
224 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Gotta love DU3 --those of us who object to men publicly lusting after children
geek tragedy
Mar 2013
#16
Noticing something and expressing that the type of 'noticing' you were doing was distracting enough
redqueen
Mar 2013
#104
i have never, once, seen the word sexually aggressive used to imply whorish. you make the claim?
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#126
oh geez, so true. isnt it. consistent. and ALL the fuckin' time. repeat and rinse again.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#151
how old are the people in that picture? I mean, when the picture was taken. Do you know?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#196
So you agree that lusting after underage girls is ok? You can cuss me all you want.
backtoblue
Mar 2013
#63
I am not interested in hearing your reaction to a comment directed to someone else.
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#84
Actually, your ability to understand one word I've written is pretty close to zero.
Buzz Clik
Mar 2013
#91
Yes, I did check the TOS box. Tombstone says he was a previously banned troll. nt
geek tragedy
Mar 2013
#110
it is there for all to read buzz. whisp about said it the way it is. see how foolish that post of
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#129
throw in warrens dismissal with a thread of hair on fire wimminz and men. clever enough not
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#152
"clever enough not to defend"... what? to not defend "message auto-removed"?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#184
when only listening to your buddies continually reinforce it is nature, biology, to get off on girls
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#52
no, as another poster noted, it was common for young women to hold hands or walk arm in arm
HiPointDem
Mar 2013
#127
now and then. now, we photoshop to have a group of men blocking way, and intimidating
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#56
i think that is more apt with what the women are doing in that picture. but hey... if yawl want
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#153
I'm sorry, maybe you can give me the cliffs notes version of the outrage.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#158
I want to know more about the pornification photoshop conspiracy you mention upthread.
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#169
Reference to photoshopping didn't account for there being two different pictures.
dipsydoodle
Mar 2013
#170
wait.. you're suggesting that I replied to you in a somewhat non-linear fashion?
Warren DeMontague
Mar 2013
#183
prove to the others in the herd that they 'belong' and don't care what the women think.
seabeyond
Mar 2013
#103
My dad in his old age kept crashing into stuff oogling at women walking on the side walk.
Cleita
Mar 2013
#105
I also noticed several jury results posted, too, but there haven't been any call-outs yet.
pacalo
Mar 2013
#213