General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: We think of the Middle Ages as being more violent than modern times, but I wonder if it really was. [View all]KittyWampus
(55,894 posts)It seems counter-intuitive
. I will see if I can find it.
FOUND IT FOR YOU
The central thesis of Better Angels is that our era is less violent, less cruel and more peaceful than any previous period of human existence. The decline in violence holds for violence in the family, in neighborhoods, between tribes and between states. People living now are less likely to meet a violent death, or to suffer from violence or cruelty at the hands of others, than people living in any previous century.
Pinker assumes that many of his readers will be skeptical of this claim, so he spends six substantial chapters documenting it. That may sound like a hard slog, but for anyone interested in understanding human nature, the material is engrossing, and when the going gets heavy, Pinker knows how to lighten it with ironic comments and a touch of humor.
Pinker begins with studies of the causes of death in different eras and peoples. Some studies are based on skeletons found at archaeological sites; averaging their results suggests that 15 percent of prehistoric humans met a violent death at the hands of another person. Research into contemporary or recent hunter-gatherer societies yields a remarkably similarly average, while another cluster of studies of pre-state societies that include some horticulture has an even higher rate of violent death. In contrast, among state societies, the most violent appears to have been Aztec Mexico, in which 5 percent of people were killed by others. In Europe, even during the bloodiest periods the 17th century and the first half of the 20th deaths in war were around 3 percent. The data vindicates Hobbess basic insight, that without a state, life is likely to be nasty, brutish and short. In contrast, a state monopoly on the legitimate use of force reduces violence and makes everyone living under that monopoly better off than they would otherwise have been. Pinker calls this the pacification process.
Its not only deaths in war, but murder, too, that is declining over the long term. Even those tribal peoples extolled by anthropologists as especially gentle, like the Semai of Malaysia, the Kung of the Kalahari and the Central Arctic Inuit, turn out to have murder rates that are, relative to population, comparable to those of Detroit. In Europe, your chance of being murdered is now less than one-tenth, and in some countries only one-fiftieth, of what it would have been if you had lived 500 years ago. American rates, too, have fallen steeply over the past two or three centuries. Pinker sees this decline as part of the civilizing process, a term he borrows from the sociologist Norbert Elias, who attributes it to the consolidation of the power of the state above feudal loyalties, and to the effect of the spread of commerce. (Consistent with this view, Pinker argues that at least part of the reason for the regional differences in American homicide rates is that people in the South are less likely to accept the states monopoly on force. Instead, a tradition of self-help justice and a culture of honor sanctions retaliation when one is insulted or mistreated. Statistics bear this out the higher homicide rate in the South is due to quarrels that turn lethal, not to more killings during armed robberies and experiments show that even today Southerners respond more strongly to insults than Northerners.)
http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/09/books/review/the-better-angels-of-our-nature-by-steven-pinker-book-review.html?bl&_r=0