Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Veri1138

(61 posts)
52. Thank you for the intelligent reply...
Fri Feb 22, 2013, 01:38 PM
Feb 2013

Anger would be the wrong word. Disappointment would be more like it. In that Democrats are engaged in their own hubris. That, despite what so many Democrats say they believe, based on all that information out there that they knew about. Sitting their glued to the information highway, parsing the data, etc.

That not enough of them live up to what they say they believe. That many still sit around doing, effectively, nothing. Helping to continue the status quo. Crowing about the decline of the Republican Party in the face of an illusory Democratic juggernaut. All the while being led down the same path that Bush was leading them down.

It was interesting with OWS. Obama wins by five million votes, what... sixty-three million voters who voted Democratic? Where were those sixty-three million Democrats when OWS was getting started? Where are those sixty-three million voters protesting Obama and his policies? Where were those sixty-three million Democrats when Obama decided not to investigate war crimes from the previous Administration? Where are those sixty-three million voters protesting the decline of Main Street as Wall Street consumes more of America's (and hence, the Democratic voter's) wealth? Where are those sixty-three million voters protesting the continuation of Afghanistan? Drone wars? Government spying? Whistle blowers being jailed? Demanding transparency from one of the most opaque Administration's in history?

You know where those Democratic voters were and are? Voting for all the above. And more. Drone wars. Afghanistan. Government spying. Executive assassination. Fraudclosure, the continuation of. Income inequality. Voting 'no' to single-payer health care. Voting for a President - a Democratic President - who put Social Security and Medicare on the table for cuts. Wall Street bailouts and TBTF. And all the above. Things the "progressive" Democrat claim to be against. They seem to be voting for all of this quite a lot.

And then to call themselves Democrats and Progressives. Hypocrisy. Pure, unadulterated hypocrisy. There is a difference between what a person says and does. Democrats - in effect, the New Republicans - judging by what the Democratic Party has come to represent; they need to stop saying and start doing. All sixty-three million of them.

They need to stop being fauxgressives and start doing. The first step is to realize that they have a serious problem, among many. One, that their actions do not match their words. That would be a good start.

On a side note, what would America be like under a single-party system?

yes obxhead Feb 2013 #1
MSNBC was a cheerleader for the Iraq War before they were against it... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #3
so was Hillary Clinton MNBrewer Feb 2013 #4
Their Administration lied to them. Just as they lied and withheld information from Colin Powell. judesedit Feb 2013 #42
Too bad we're not treating those criminals the way criminals need to be treated. MNBrewer Feb 2013 #45
I know it's easy to get them confused, but tavalon Feb 2013 #9
Yes they were, obxhead Feb 2013 #17
Air America was the only place you could get antiwar talk. I efhmc Feb 2013 #22
Air America Didn't Debut Until March, 2004... KharmaTrain Feb 2013 #33
Ok, obxhead Feb 2013 #49
Yep, I remember when they cancelled Phil Donahue's show that was doing great. freshwest Feb 2013 #18
And? How does not that fit with what Rachel said? gtar100 Feb 2013 #19
Cable news outlets report what gets ratings and sponsors loyalsister Feb 2013 #35
Ah, yes... "Hubris"... and Rachel Maddow... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #2
I read a book called Hubris on the same subject about 5 years ago, what gives? xtraxritical Feb 2013 #5
The broadcast was based on that book. n/t winter is coming Feb 2013 #6
Oh thanks, now I get it, I thought she was selling a book she wrote. I tuned in a little late! xtraxritical Feb 2013 #26
Ah. Yes, she explained it in the first minute or so of the broadcast. winter is coming Feb 2013 #37
You got that, "pissed me off all over again". You know, President Obama wanted to be a healer. xtraxritical Feb 2013 #44
Ah, yes... Hubris...and Rachael Maddow sheshe2 Feb 2013 #7
True.... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #12
I believe that Rachel is instead using MSNBC sheshe2 Feb 2013 #15
+1 Little Star Feb 2013 #28
You don't seem to recognize that the brad blog you keep referencing tavalon Feb 2013 #10
Of course, bradblog is quite favorable toward "Hubris"... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #13
Are you trying to say we don't? tavalon Feb 2013 #14
Hubris: snort Feb 2013 #21
As I and others said, there was Air America to counter the happy war talk. efhmc Feb 2013 #23
Air America didn't get started until around mid-2004 Downtown Hound Feb 2013 #24
Oh, of course... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #29
Thanks for being a voice of sanity CitizenPatriot Feb 2013 #32
What point(s) did you want to discuss about Brad's article? pacalo Feb 2013 #16
Well said. efhmc Feb 2013 #25
"Hubris" in quotations is just for the title... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #30
Speaking of "rookies" Plucketeer Feb 2013 #31
Well, having actually been there... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #36
LOL! Plucketeer Feb 2013 #38
Your post #31 pretty much nailed it. defacto7 Feb 2013 #39
Deny all you want... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #51
I have to wonder Plucketeer Feb 2013 #53
The question is... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #54
"A rookie mistake". pacalo Feb 2013 #43
Thank you for a reasoned response erronis Feb 2013 #48
Thanks. pacalo Feb 2013 #50
Thank you for the intelligent reply... Veri1138 Feb 2013 #52
Excellent! sheshe2 Feb 2013 #8
Innit? tavalon Feb 2013 #11
Speaking of fab people, amuse bouche Feb 2013 #20
I adore Rachel! Little Star Feb 2013 #27
Good Advice for Everybody. Thanks Cha Feb 2013 #34
Perfect Rachel! defacto7 Feb 2013 #40
Their Administration lied to them. Just as they lied and withheld information from Colin Powell. judesedit Feb 2013 #41
Love this woman. nt cyberpj Feb 2013 #46
Why aren't the war criminals with "Hubris" being held accountable? just1voice Feb 2013 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rachel Maddow: "......»Reply #52