Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Oklahoma: Insist That People Coexisted With Dinosaurs…and Get an A in Science Class! [View all]kiri
(794 posts)69. Evolution is Not a religion
http://concordareahumanists.org/blog/201301/evolution-religion
Is Evolution a Religion?
By Ellery Schempp
IDists claim that there is an "intelligent design" view and that
evolution is "an equal religion". They usually say "Darwinism". Of
course, there is no such thing as "Darwinism", this is a word made up
by IDists to label those who do not accept their views. Let's
consider what characterizes traditional religions and whether
evolution is a religion. The historical record shows numerous
distinctions.
The Theory of Evolution is not a religion.
Evolution has no priests, pastors, ministers, preachers, bishops,
ayatollahs, imams, mullahs, prophets (or televangelical profits). No
holy books or sacred scriptures. It has no holidays, no feast days,
no canonized saints. It depends on no miracles. It gets no tax
exemptions.
Evolution has no alter boys, no prayers, no church establishments, no
edifices with crosses, stars or crescents, no churches or temples, no
coming-of-age rituals like Bar Mitzvah or confirmation.
Evolution has no banned books, no warnings about heresy or blasphemy,
no record of burning witches or heretics, no public displays of piety
or prayer, no holy book supposed to contain "All Truth", no creed to
be ritually recited. Evolution does not define pagans or infidels.
There are no mythological beliefs or transubstantiations.
Evolution has no history of torturing non-believers, has never
started a war, never burned an opponent at the stake. The idea of
evolution has no record of sex scandals. No record of financial
fraud. No record of trying to get a passport stamped for entry into
heaven. Evolution offers no condemnations to hell nor promises of an
after-life.
Evolution does not support occult beliefs. The scientific theory of
evolution has no dependence on a supernatural deity or pixies; no
prayer rituals, no burial rituals, no sacraments. There are no
invisible beings, gods, deities, devils, demons, ghosts, satans,
angels, spirits, cherubim, seraphim, faeries, or a soul. Evolution
recognizes no destructions as "acts of God" nor acts of violence
as "acts of Satan or an anti-christ."
Evolution does not depend on blind faith; it offers no argument from
authority; no conclusion first, facts second. There is no body
of "apologetics" from the theory of evolution.
The above are evidences of religion. The idea of evolution, which is
based on observation of the natural world as we see it, does not have
any of the attributes of religion. Indeed, evolution is the
opposite, it welcomes energetic inquiries and thoughtful inputs.
Evolution looks not to miracles to understand the world around us.
Evolution, as all science, looks to evidence that we can see and
understand and test. Neither evolution nor any scientific construct
claims to offer moral or political guidance.
Evolution is consistent with a democratic outlook in which the rights
of the people are derived from the people. Evolution is not
consistent with the view that the natural world is only revealed by
authorities or a view that rights derive from authorities, especially
not from authorities anointed under a doctrine of the Divine Right of
Kings or one or another "holy scripture". It is the natural world as all can see and understand, and it
depends on no revelations, no sacred texts.
The Theory of Evolution, the Theory of Gravity, the Germ Theory of
Disease are not religion and not religious. Just because you think
something is true does not make it a religion.
The theory of evolution is the antithesis of traditional religions;
it champions the free mind, and the spirit of free inquiry to see
where facts, observations, and the power of reason as the human mind
leads.
Is Evolution a Religion?
By Ellery Schempp
IDists claim that there is an "intelligent design" view and that
evolution is "an equal religion". They usually say "Darwinism". Of
course, there is no such thing as "Darwinism", this is a word made up
by IDists to label those who do not accept their views. Let's
consider what characterizes traditional religions and whether
evolution is a religion. The historical record shows numerous
distinctions.
The Theory of Evolution is not a religion.
Evolution has no priests, pastors, ministers, preachers, bishops,
ayatollahs, imams, mullahs, prophets (or televangelical profits). No
holy books or sacred scriptures. It has no holidays, no feast days,
no canonized saints. It depends on no miracles. It gets no tax
exemptions.
Evolution has no alter boys, no prayers, no church establishments, no
edifices with crosses, stars or crescents, no churches or temples, no
coming-of-age rituals like Bar Mitzvah or confirmation.
Evolution has no banned books, no warnings about heresy or blasphemy,
no record of burning witches or heretics, no public displays of piety
or prayer, no holy book supposed to contain "All Truth", no creed to
be ritually recited. Evolution does not define pagans or infidels.
There are no mythological beliefs or transubstantiations.
Evolution has no history of torturing non-believers, has never
started a war, never burned an opponent at the stake. The idea of
evolution has no record of sex scandals. No record of financial
fraud. No record of trying to get a passport stamped for entry into
heaven. Evolution offers no condemnations to hell nor promises of an
after-life.
Evolution does not support occult beliefs. The scientific theory of
evolution has no dependence on a supernatural deity or pixies; no
prayer rituals, no burial rituals, no sacraments. There are no
invisible beings, gods, deities, devils, demons, ghosts, satans,
angels, spirits, cherubim, seraphim, faeries, or a soul. Evolution
recognizes no destructions as "acts of God" nor acts of violence
as "acts of Satan or an anti-christ."
Evolution does not depend on blind faith; it offers no argument from
authority; no conclusion first, facts second. There is no body
of "apologetics" from the theory of evolution.
The above are evidences of religion. The idea of evolution, which is
based on observation of the natural world as we see it, does not have
any of the attributes of religion. Indeed, evolution is the
opposite, it welcomes energetic inquiries and thoughtful inputs.
Evolution looks not to miracles to understand the world around us.
Evolution, as all science, looks to evidence that we can see and
understand and test. Neither evolution nor any scientific construct
claims to offer moral or political guidance.
Evolution is consistent with a democratic outlook in which the rights
of the people are derived from the people. Evolution is not
consistent with the view that the natural world is only revealed by
authorities or a view that rights derive from authorities, especially
not from authorities anointed under a doctrine of the Divine Right of
Kings or one or another "holy scripture". It is the natural world as all can see and understand, and it
depends on no revelations, no sacred texts.
The Theory of Evolution, the Theory of Gravity, the Germ Theory of
Disease are not religion and not religious. Just because you think
something is true does not make it a religion.
The theory of evolution is the antithesis of traditional religions;
it champions the free mind, and the spirit of free inquiry to see
where facts, observations, and the power of reason as the human mind
leads.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Oklahoma: Insist That People Coexisted With Dinosaurs…and Get an A in Science Class! [View all]
Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin
Feb 2013
OP
Is Blackwell even aware that some OK students would eventually like to get into good colleges? nt
MrScorpio
Feb 2013
#1
seems like he's far more interested in making sure they attend an approved church
0rganism
Feb 2013
#86
No. A science paper is graded on the understanding of the science in the paper...
SidDithers
Feb 2013
#8
IWell Creationism is not science and I say this as a Chrisian. As for the courts they are there for
hrmjustin
May 2013
#125
I also said, "Well supported". Being well-articulate alone isn't enough.
OceanEcosystem
Feb 2013
#13
"Well supported" as in: "Derrrrr ... Gawd done sed it in the book he done rited!"
Arugula Latte
Feb 2013
#18
Do you understand there is a difference between Scientific Theory and common theory
Bandit
Feb 2013
#26
Gravity consisntently kills those that don't believe in it. And many that do.
Ikonoklast
Feb 2013
#80
Newtowian mechanics explained gravity quite well for hundreds of years before Einstein
xtraxritical
Feb 2013
#89
Einsteins's theory of gravity did NOT replace Newton's theory, it includes Newton's theory. nt
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2013
#109
If they can pull it off, forget the grade, they will be looking at a Nobel Prize n/t
Demo_Chris
Feb 2013
#58
anyone who wastes a science teacher's time with 7 pages of creationist wank deserves an F
0rganism
Feb 2013
#88
Good luck finding a scientifically supported case for creationism in a high school science report
LonePirate
Feb 2013
#15
"Evolutionist view" ... Uh, you mean "the view" of 99.99999999999 percent of all legit scientists?
Arugula Latte
Feb 2013
#17
"Apples" as in the apple that the first woman on the planet ate, you know, 4,000-6,000
Arugula Latte
Feb 2013
#34
The great scientists of our past looked outside the theories and laws of their times.
backtoblue
Feb 2013
#10
That totally backwards. Anyone who can "prove their thoughts" pro creationism deserves a Nobel prize
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2013
#110
I didn't say that they could prove it. I said they should try to if that's what they believe.
backtoblue
Feb 2013
#112
They can try all they want. They will still get a richly deserved F.
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2013
#113
I believe rainbow-sparkle unicorns exist. My source? My own ass. I pulled that theory out of it.
Arugula Latte
Feb 2013
#36
ALEC sponsored legislation...they're doing it in other states...phuckers...knr
joeybee12
Feb 2013
#14
I don't have an issue with students not accepting everything they're being taught in science class
hughee99
Feb 2013
#27
If a student wants to bang his head against the wall trying to prove creationism
hughee99
Feb 2013
#48
No, creationism has an invisible deity as a component, which is by definition unprovable.
Occulus
Feb 2013
#49
If this is science education in Oklahoma, better check to see where your Doctor is from--the SOONER
kairos12
Feb 2013
#39
Creationism is completely and utterly unverifiable nonsense based on a fictional work
kestrel91316
Feb 2013
#46
Actually the Democrats in Congress are trying to coexist with dinosaurs, but the dinosaurs are an
still_one
Feb 2013
#52
Gee I wish I could have received an A for whatever I believed was a correct answer on exams.
Lint Head
Feb 2013
#57
That's like giving students an A in "Abstinence Only" class, for having sex on a desk.
Warren DeMontague
Feb 2013
#59
Jesus said: "Let the little Sinosauropteryx and Microceratops come to me, and forbid them not,
Arugula Latte
Feb 2013
#83
Where Oklahoma Common Education Committee fits into the grand scheme of things:
Bernardo de La Paz
Feb 2013
#66
Will they be able to use episodes of "The Flintstones" or Jim Henson's "Dinosaurs" as references?
rwsanders
Feb 2013
#70
Academic freedom doesn't mean a student can put wrong answers on a test and still get credit.
yellowcanine
Feb 2013
#93
Sharing far and wide. thanks for letting us know about this. Unbe-effing-believable. nt
stevenleser
Feb 2013
#111
It would do less damage to these kids if they just stopped teaching altogether. nt
Ed Suspicious
Feb 2013
#114
Let'em watch The Flinstones for their science, it would be right up their alley,,,,
benld74
Feb 2013
#115