Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Sat Feb 16, 2013, 01:12 PM Feb 2013

Jefferson and drones [View all]

Jefferson ordered attacks on pirate ships with US citizens among the crew, based on a Congressional authorization of force (he had requested but not received an explicit declaration of war). This included the famous razing of the USS Philadelphia at anchor (a ship at anchor is a current threat to no one).

He did not receive an explicit declaration of war because the pirates were trans-national non-state actors only ambivalently supported by the Barbary states (sound familiar?). This also led to charges that Jefferson was setting up a permanent US security apparatus in the form of the Navy and Marine Corps. This from a man who shipped the Constitutional Convention because he worried the government would have too many powers, and agonized over whether he could legally buy Louisiana from France.

I don't know where people get the idea that Americans outside of the US have received judicial review before being declared under arms against the US or being declared hostis humani generis (which is the relevant question for terrorism, anyways). Because I can't find an example of that happening -- the decision seems to have been left to the executive since very early, despite Congress's explicit authority over piracy.

46 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jefferson and drones [View all] Recursion Feb 2013 OP
Yes, let's make any argument we can to justify ditching our liberties whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #1
I'm pointing out that this is a debate as old as the Republic Recursion Feb 2013 #2
Well let me point out whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #6
The Administration has not claimed an authority to assassinate arbitrary Americans "who might pose struggle4progress Feb 2013 #22
They need to rewrite it whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #23
Who needs to rewrite what? struggle4progress Feb 2013 #25
The legal basis for that provision of the NDAA whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #26
There seems to have been a political consensus in the US for about a dozen years struggle4progress Feb 2013 #27
Fuck political consensus whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #28
If you merely intend to complain without effect, why should anyone listen? But if you want an effect struggle4progress Feb 2013 #30
If you get that person to actually evaluate your points logically, you should get appointed the stevenleser Feb 2013 #32
Unfortunately, to convince people, it is usually necessary to get them to reach struggle4progress Feb 2013 #33
This is typical of what I have seen of the anti-drone crowd on DU. Non-rational when it comes to stevenleser Feb 2013 #35
Bullshit whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #36
You clearly haven't heard anything stevenleser Feb 2013 #39
Uh huh whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #41
You win the debate as any reasoned person can see. stevenleser Feb 2013 #29
whatchamacallit has it Puzzledtraveller Feb 2013 #24
Whose liberties? My liberties are just fine. EastKYLiberal Feb 2013 #7
Oh yay whatchamacallit Feb 2013 #9
What pirate ship was Alawi on? tblue Feb 2013 #3
I'm sure Jefferson would have been in favor of drones. hughee99 Feb 2013 #4
Did you skip the part of the OP that said that Jefferson did exactly what you suggest would appall stevenleser Feb 2013 #34
You don't see a difference between allowing attacks on pirate ships hughee99 Feb 2013 #38
No, I dont see the difference. And that is based on the anti-drone arguments as presented stevenleser Feb 2013 #40
Obama hate. That must be it. hughee99 Feb 2013 #42
Jefferson? Ah, yes, in praise of 225 years unhampered by progress. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #5
i wasn't trying to say it's easy, just that it's precedented Recursion Feb 2013 #8
Yes, but, precedent doesn't actually validate throwing away 200 yrs of moral progress... HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #11
Like what? What moral progress or progress of any kind has been made in dealing with that kind of a stevenleser Feb 2013 #31
We no longer summarily hang pirates from yardarms Recursion Feb 2013 #44
Now we fire bullets, shells and missiles at their boats from warships. stevenleser Feb 2013 #45
We always did that Recursion Feb 2013 #46
"Because I do it with one small ship, I am called a terrorist. You do it with a whole fleet... Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #10
I've heard that called "Jefferson's self-imposed War Powers Act" in the past. Gorp Feb 2013 #12
There has been a distinction, historically Recursion Feb 2013 #14
"America does not go abroad in search of monsters to destroy." John Quincy Adams Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #13
On our better days Recursion Feb 2013 #15
Obviously, the military and CIA consider themselves above the law. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #16
In seven years in the Marine Corps, I never met anyone Recursion Feb 2013 #17
You never met any officers? Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #19
I met plenty of officers Recursion Feb 2013 #20
They were more concerned with kissing ass than the peasants were. Tierra_y_Libertad Feb 2013 #21
The best that can be said in response is that the drone targets are very rarely if ever geek tragedy Feb 2013 #18
Excellent OP. nt msanthrope Feb 2013 #37
Jefferson acted to an open and ongoing explicit threat in a certain area. Are_grits_groceries Feb 2013 #43
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jefferson and drones