Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)

26. Forget gun owning, I wouldn't want my red state sen. to know I've sung at the WI Capitol.

Reply to ZombieHunter (Reply #24)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 03:05 PM

Feb 2013

The head of the state police is none other than the patriarch of the teahadists in charge.

The r's already send Capitol police out into the counties seeking nonconforming melodious maladroits.

Drones would be way to attractive a temptation for them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

37 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

I have an idea on how to close all the gun loop holes quite easily. [View all] Bandit Feb 2013 OP

Good idea. But, I think much more needs to be done about Hoyt Feb 2013 #1

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #2

Wow, think that up all by yourself? Robb Feb 2013 #3

The Second Amendment doesn't mention anything about a permit derby378 Feb 2013 #4

I suppose you don't need a birth certificate either... rgbecker Feb 2013 #6

You need to realign how you approach this... derby378 Feb 2013 #12

"well regulated", or has that been edited out these days? nt msongs Feb 2013 #7

Oh, give it up... derby378 Feb 2013 #11

Nancy Lanza wasn't well-regulated. Neither was James Holmes. maxsolomon Feb 2013 #17

I *own* military armaments... derby378 Feb 2013 #19

I misread your previous post maxsolomon Feb 2013 #37

Only problem Duckhunter935 Feb 2013 #5

Rights can be abridged el_bryanto Feb 2013 #9

And, the Ninth Amendment. Robb Feb 2013 #10

Lots of people do lots of things that disturb my tranquility.., Coyote_Tan Feb 2013 #20

Not "illegal"; unconstitutional. Robb Feb 2013 #22

*checks my own desert tan boots* Coyote_Tan Feb 2013 #23

Jibe. It's a sailing term. maxsolomon Feb 2013 #18

It's not bad kudzu22 Feb 2013 #8

This is a much better idea than divvying up guns into "good" and "bad" classes Recursion Feb 2013 #13

I think it's a good idea Locrian Feb 2013 #14

Because in this country, we have rights... derby378 Feb 2013 #15

Message auto-removed ZombieHunter Feb 2013 #25

Message auto-removed johnnie quick Feb 2013 #16

Passing one background check and then having no checks would be a terrible mistake. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #21

Message auto-removed ZombieHunter Feb 2013 #24

Forget gun owning, I wouldn't want my red state sen. to know I've sung at the WI Capitol. HereSince1628 Feb 2013 #26

Message auto-removed ZombieHunter Feb 2013 #27

If they could put computer chips in guns that only allow them to work in designated areas via gps libertyandjustice24 Feb 2013 #28

check out TriggerSmart! farminator3000 Feb 2013 #30

that is prett bad ass thanks for the link. That would be great. Gun control and a new market libertyandjustice24 Feb 2013 #31

YES! ^^^ farminator3000 Feb 2013 #33

One Quick Answer to Sandy Hook? Repeal the 2005 Arms Act farminator3000 Feb 2013 #29

I totally agree with you ~ We have to pass a test to drive a car goclark Feb 2013 #32

Technically, already been done in many states pediatricmedic Feb 2013 #34

Throw in a non-discretionary federal CCW permit, valid in all 50 states, and I might go for it badtoworse Feb 2013 #35

Just what the government needs. Another list of people OGKush Feb 2013 #36