Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)

44. And in law school

Reply to BainsBane (Reply #42)

Thu Feb 7, 2013, 03:53 AM

Feb 2013

We learn that changing the topic is not a good way of advancing a point.

There are a lot of laws which determine whom you can sue for what, where you can sue them, and when you can sue them.

I am no fan of the federal law protecting gun makers from product liability suits. It has nothing, zip, zero, nada to do with the first amendment, however.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

48 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

This message was self-deleted by its author [View all] BainsBane Feb 2013 OP

That's not the first amendment. Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #1

Forget it, he's rolling. SayWut Feb 2013 #3

It's not the First Amendment, but a pink gun??? That looks like a toy not just to a child JDPriestly Feb 2013 #4

Actually, you do raise a first amendment issue jberryhill Feb 2013 #15

where fault lies depends on the circumstance BainsBane Feb 2013 #5

No, they don't Spider Jerusalem Feb 2013 #7

that's absurd BainsBane Feb 2013 #12

Additional evidence BainsBane Feb 2013 #14

A suit by an individual against a gun company... jberryhill Feb 2013 #17

It does not need to be in a federal court to involve constitutionality BainsBane Feb 2013 #21

Now go read Article III jberryhill Feb 2013 #22

ruling constitutionality BainsBane Feb 2013 #25

Oh good lord... jberryhill Feb 2013 #28

and what aoubt the FL law that bans doctors BainsBane Feb 2013 #30

"Real life lawyers" jberryhill Feb 2013 #33

I thought you said one year of law school? BainsBane Feb 2013 #35

I said one year of civ pro and a year and a half of con law jberryhill Feb 2013 #37

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #39

Congrats. jberryhill Feb 2013 #43

well, I would like to discuss the issue of BainsBane Feb 2013 #45

Then start a thread on it jberryhill Feb 2013 #47

That FL law does under involve a first amendment issue jberryhill Feb 2013 #48

And by the way jberryhill Feb 2013 #31

then why do you refuse to address the central question? BainsBane Feb 2013 #34

Holy... jberryhill Feb 2013 #38

You again refuse to address the question BainsBane Feb 2013 #41

The title of this thread is: jberryhill Feb 2013 #40

several posts ago I wrote: BainsBane Feb 2013 #42

And in law school jberryhill Feb 2013 #44

I have not changed the topic BainsBane Feb 2013 #46

no where did I or the image BainsBane Feb 2013 #6

The Supreme Court supports my position BainsBane Feb 2013 #11

The right to sue THE GOVERNMENT jberryhill Feb 2013 #13

it specifies petitions to the courts BainsBane Feb 2013 #16

Sigh... jberryhill Feb 2013 #19

you aren't reading the links BainsBane Feb 2013 #24

I am reading the links jberryhill Feb 2013 #26

Did you read the argument by the First Amendment Center? BainsBane Feb 2013 #27

Yes and you are still entirely off the map jberryhill Feb 2013 #29

the ruling was based on political expression BainsBane Feb 2013 #32

The birther cases are thrown out for lack of standing jberryhill Feb 2013 #36

another source BainsBane Feb 2013 #18

Basic gun safety should be taught in public schools NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #2

Unless it's a toy gun, right? jberryhill Feb 2013 #23

This message was self-deleted by its author NYC_SKP Feb 2013 #8

Post removed Post removed Feb 2013 #9

Good question. DeSwiss Feb 2013 #10

That second item is a gun, not a toy. But there are lots of toys that geckosfeet Feb 2013 #20