Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

dballance

(5,756 posts)
Fri Feb 1, 2013, 03:25 PM Feb 2013

Just Because it's a Cute Deer w/ a Fluffy White Tail Doesn't Make it Okay to Break the Law [View all]

I know I'm going to get flamed for this but here it is anyway.

The law that prohibits people from having that deer and other wild animals is there to protect the animals. It was the right, kind and humane thing for the couple to do to get the fawn out of immediate harm's way as the initially did. It was the wrong thing for them to do raise a wild animal in a pen on their property. They should have turned it over to the IN Dept. of Natural Resources.

Wild animals raised by humans become domesticated and dependent upon humans. They don't have a chance to learn the survival skills they need in the wild from their mothers. Humans can't teach them that. This couple apparently intended to turn the deer back out into the wild. They were spending less time with it to prepare it one article reported. When I was growing up on a farm my dad told us in these sorts of cases that if we took in an orphaned wild animal we were going to take care of it for it's life. Because animals raised temporarily by people like this couple rarely survive long when put back into the wild.

If they are predator animals they never learned to hunt because they were fed by humans. An animal like this deer never learned from its mother the smells of the predators and when to hide or how to forage for food.

People are all up in arms about euthanizing the deer. Well turning it back into the wild was likely a death sentence in its own right. It is just as likely that the deer has already been killed by a predator it never learned to avoid. Or that it's starving to death because it didn't learn to forage for food properly. It could not have possibly learned those skills living in a pen and being fed by humans.

It's a further insult that the Indiana Dept. of Natural Resources wants the charges dropped against this couple now. The only reason they're doing this is all the crap on the Internet. Well that's a fair and equal application of the law. How about all the other people who have been or will be charged under this law? I guess they still have to go to court and actually defend themselves if they can't muster an Internet outrage.

30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Just because someone else may have been charged is no excuse. former9thward Feb 2013 #1
Re-Read My Post. I Said they did the right thing saving it. Not "let it die in agony." dballance Feb 2013 #7
Yes, I missed that but the state said they were going to kill the deer. former9thward Feb 2013 #11
It only had too much human contact because the humans kept it. LiberalFighter Feb 2013 #29
Well as a Matter of Fact, It Actually Is. If You Believe in the Equal Application of Justice dballance Feb 2013 #13
As I said -- who else has been charged with this crime??? former9thward Feb 2013 #16
I didn't realize they kept it in a pen. That does change my view of the situation. Slightly. randome Feb 2013 #2
Deer are supposed to die in the wild. bluedigger Feb 2013 #10
Sounds like you haven't really read about the case... joeybee12 Feb 2013 #3
Then enlighten me with links to the stories that detail their qualifications /eom dballance Feb 2013 #4
Plenty of stories about this posted here the past day or two... joeybee12 Feb 2013 #6
I Haven't Seen a Single Story Linked To That Said These People dballance Feb 2013 #8
why do you hate baby deer? Enrique Feb 2013 #5
And the punishment should fit the "crime". bluedigger Feb 2013 #9
Wildlife rehabbers exist to transition wildlife back into their habitat. Doremus Feb 2013 #12
Another thing to consider auburngrad82 Feb 2013 #14
what bugs me is it is a cop saying obey what laws you wish CBGLuthier Feb 2013 #15
Ok, how 'bout "Because it's a stupid law" ?? Myrina Feb 2013 #17
Exactly! hamsterjill Feb 2013 #21
No That's Not How Laws are Changed. dballance Feb 2013 #23
They use case law in their arguments. hamsterjill Feb 2013 #30
How About NO. You Don't Get to Decide Which Laws are Stupid So They Should be Broken. dballance Feb 2013 #22
Raising a wild animal doesn't domesticate it; it is just a captive wild animal FarCenter Feb 2013 #18
Thanks for Nit-Picking. However, according to Webster's dballance Feb 2013 #24
If it couldn't be released into the wild KamaAina Feb 2013 #19
I Think That Would Have Been a Great Solution to the Problem /eom dballance Feb 2013 #25
This message was self-deleted by its author hamsterjill Feb 2013 #20
So, there weren't enough threads already about this subject? Sigh.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #26
You are perfectly free to use the ignore button and to not waste your time reading the thread dballance Feb 2013 #27
Like I stated, just another thread on the same subject.... OldDem2012 Feb 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Just Because it's a Cute ...