Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Regulators Discover a Hidden Viral Gene in Commercial GMO Crops - January 21, 2013 [View all]NYC_SKP
(68,644 posts)1. Fuckers. nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
127 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Regulators Discover a Hidden Viral Gene in Commercial GMO Crops - January 21, 2013 [View all]
farminator3000
Jan 2013
OP
You are relying on a study that doesn't say what the media just reported it as saying.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#66
I'm trying to figure out what the deal is with this 'independent science news' group...
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#14
try clicking 'about' on their homepage for starters, they seem to be mentioning you...
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#31
Here's a great take-down of the scaremongering this paper triggered in the media.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#15
Yep. Sadly, we're behind the curve still, and that translates into lost jobs.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#41
no, you are wrong, that take down is of a LINK from the OP article, not a takedown of the OP
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#34
'might' applies as much or more to the 'idea' that they are safe. show scientific evidence of safety
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#48
by a guy who works for a company that publishes an animal testing supplies mag
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#108
here's a good start- it's a complex issue, not resolvable by unfounded opinions
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#63
and nobody knows yet, that is the whole point. the 'safety' research is good and all other is bad?
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#28
I have made no statements that require any such argument from credential.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#50
perhaps it is invisible-is planting millions of acres of crap that nobody wants or needs progress?
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#109
i'm an actual farmer, slappy. i grow 250 acres of plants, so easy with your garden hose, there
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#58
also check #76- i think you meant 'that proves me wrong so i won't read it'
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#78
funny how you ignore that part where i totally blow up your argument and then post nonsense
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#99
I'm constraining it to one issue at a time, because you keep spinning off in random directions.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#100
you responded by typing some nonsense. still waiting for some info, here
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#104
the virus 'in the flora' is natural. the virus injected into the DNA is COMPLETELY different
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#115
It isn't totally untested. You keep saying that as if it's true, it isn't.
AtheistCrusader
Jan 2013
#117
why won't big M make their studies public? oh, right, they ALSO prove GMOs are bad...
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#126
"I am a bit numb and distrustful of anything that doesn’t clearly and concisely link back to sources
Coyotl
Jan 2013
#23
that was a flawed study, thoroughly discredited in the larger scientific community...
mike_c
Jan 2013
#95
Call me old fashioned, but I like the older stuff. I'm tired of dead food, flowers without fragrance
freshwest
Jan 2013
#101
"Monsanto’s trials that showed no ill effects lasted just three months."
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#110
"Genetic Roulette" will be shown on Free Speech TV on Saturday 1-25 and Sunday 1-27
DearHeart
Jan 2013
#124
"There is a hollow democratic deficit here, is there not? . . ." the cover up story. good one.
farminator3000
Jan 2013
#125