Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
24. I don't know whether our government's expenditures are transparent enough for them to do that.
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 05:30 PM
Jan 2013

We are, for example, implicated through some sort of military or quasi-military presence in a number of African countries. Why? What is the extent of our engagement? How much are we spending on it?

The CIA budget, I believe, may be mostly classified. A lot of the troublemaking starts there as far as we can tell from the tiny bit we know. And yet, there is a lot of legitimate information-gathering at the CIA that doesn't stir the already troubled waters around the world.

More transparency might make it easier to discuss the details of cutting our military budget. And we will not improve our government's budget unless we drastically cut the military.

We cannot cut Social Security or Medicare or Medicaid or Food Stamps or SSI or health care. Those expenditures keep Americans alive and out of the bankruptcy courts. Every penny "saved" on those programs had to be found somewhere in our economy. It's best to leave those alone.

But we can cut back on our troops overseas and our too big to succeed corporate subsidies, and that is what we should do.

NY & California are really starting to take the reigns & lead on Progressivism. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #1
Here is the correct link to the Cal Dem site... Luminous Animal Jan 2013 #2
Whoop! There it IS!!! bvar22 Jan 2013 #4
yes, to the top of the greatest, then to the corrupt corporate media Follow The Money Jan 2013 #8
I'm a Califonia voter, and I approve this message. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #20
Beat me to it pinboy3niner Jan 2013 #25
K & R Liberal_Dog Jan 2013 #3
K&R think Jan 2013 #5
The states are the laboratories of democracy pscot Jan 2013 #6
I agree. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #7
"...at least 24%...." mike_c Jan 2013 #9
75% is a nice number ... Myrina Jan 2013 #12
hell yes!!! NoMoreWarNow Jan 2013 #10
I'd like for the California Democratic Party to identify exactly what they'd like to cut. blueclown Jan 2013 #11
Justifying the Military and Weapons Industries as Jobs Programs is an obscinity. bvar22 Jan 2013 #19
As recently as 2010, there were 1.6 million uniformed military personnel employed by the government. blueclown Jan 2013 #23
Clinton's Defense budget, even in real terms, was well under 75% of current dmallind Jan 2013 #27
I don't know whether our government's expenditures are transparent enough for them to do that. JDPriestly Jan 2013 #24
At least it would be a start in slimming down our most sacred of Sacred Cows. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2013 #13
Damn right! nt ElbarDee Jan 2013 #14
Yeah!! SpankMe Jan 2013 #15
K&R Remember, we didn't win the arms race, the Soviets just lost first. Scuba Jan 2013 #16
We don't need to be supporting CIA's private armies and mercenaries. Cut them. earcandle Jan 2013 #17
finally. Phlem Jan 2013 #18
Why so little? AtheistCrusader Jan 2013 #21
This message was self-deleted by its author keithmkr59255us Jan 2013 #22
That would be a good start bowens43 Jan 2013 #26
Make it so! dreamnightwind Jan 2013 #28
I'd be all for such a cut williamc1967txlib Jan 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California Democratic Par...»Reply #24