Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

kpete

(71,994 posts)
Wed Jan 16, 2013, 10:32 AM Jan 2013

The Second Amendment was Ratified to Preserve Slavery [View all]

The Second Amendment was Ratified to Preserve Slavery
Tuesday, 15 January 2013 09:35
By Thom Hartmann, Truthout | News Analysis

................

..........In the beginning, there were the militias. In the South, they were also called the "slave patrols," and they were regulated by the states.

By the time the Constitution was ratified, hundreds of substantial slave uprisings had occurred across the South. Blacks outnumbered whites in large areas, and the state militias were used to both prevent and to put down slave uprisings. As Dr. Bogus points out, slavery can only exist in the context of a police state, and the enforcement of that police state was the explicit job of the militias.

If the anti-slavery folks in the North had figured out a way to disband - or even move out of the state - those southern militias, the police state of the South would collapse. And, similarly, if the North were to invite into military service the slaves of the South, then they could be emancipated, which would collapse the institution of slavery, and the southern economic and social systems, altogether.

These two possibilities worried southerners like James Monroe, George Mason (who owned over 300 slaves) and the southern Christian evangelical, Patrick Henry (who opposed slavery on principle, but also opposed freeing slaves).

Their main concern was that Article 1, Section 8 of the newly-proposed Constitution, which gave the federal government the power to raise and supervise a militia, could also allow that federal militia to subsume their state militias and change them from slavery-enforcing institutions into something that could even, one day, free the slaves.

..................
MORE:
http://truth-out.org/news/item/13890-the-second-amendment-was-ratified-to-preserve-slavery?fb_action_ids=527613423937112&fb_action_types=og.likes&fb_source=other_multiline&action_object_map=%7B%22527613423937112%22%3A390307407725537%7D&action_type_map=%7B%22527613423937112%22%3A%22og.likes%22%7D&action_ref_map=%5B%5D
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2013/01/15/1179307/-The-Second-Amendment-was-Ratified-to-Preserve-Slavery

36 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
It has always been clear to me that the 2nd is the legalistic tool of racist bullies. nt onehandle Jan 2013 #1
It has always been clear as can be that revisionist history is heinous dog shit cali Jan 2013 #5
Complete revisionism pipoman Jan 2013 #2
Dr. Bogus..... NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #3
Revisionist history and stupid, but then I'm in the minority here cali Jan 2013 #4
Let us all know when... 99Forever Jan 2013 #10
wow. you mean if you don't have a peer reviewed dissertation any and all criticism cali Jan 2013 #12
No, I "mean" that... 99Forever Jan 2013 #14
SO you mean those doctoriaal thesis whistler162 Jan 2013 #18
Uhhhh... 99Forever Jan 2013 #19
Very good - I like it! GoneOffShore Jan 2013 #23
On loan from a likeminded friend... 99Forever Jan 2013 #35
nice proof there, i guess we are stupid unless we just take your word for it CreekDog Jan 2013 #24
I'd love to read you're dissertation on the subject. Deep13 Jan 2013 #28
My daughter, a PhD in American History, vetted this and determined that it is Ninga Jan 2013 #6
care to divulge a bit more detail? cali Jan 2013 #8
Of course. She read it, -and assured me it was fine to send out, but I will have to Ninga Jan 2013 #15
Some quick thoughts from my daughter that may or may not speak to your question. Ninga Jan 2013 #25
Too many problems with point 2. Guns were FREQUENTLY listed JimDandy Jan 2013 #31
Not necessarily revisionist. This scholar makes a pretty good case Still Sensible Jan 2013 #7
That is pure bullshit in my opinion. n/t MadrasT Jan 2013 #9
Mine too obamanut2012 Jan 2013 #13
No it wasn't. 1-Old-Man Jan 2013 #11
Ridiculous Demo_Chris Jan 2013 #16
This is the same publication which insisted that Karl Rove had been indicted: Freddie Stubbs Jan 2013 #17
Not a fair comparison. The issue with the Rove indictment was the fault of the particular journalist stevenleser Jan 2013 #21
Truthout actually gave a promotion to Leopold Freddie Stubbs Jan 2013 #32
Wrong. Impossible. 99Forever Jan 2013 #30
Truthout is an organization which has a history of having trouble with the truth Freddie Stubbs Jan 2013 #33
Thom Hartmann didn't use ... 99Forever Jan 2013 #34
Fail. Kingofalldems Jan 2013 #36
Makes sense - to an extent. Of course there were other roles for the State Militias, jmg257 Jan 2013 #20
This is unpersuasive, I'm afraid Spider Jerusalem Jan 2013 #22
And one of the key drivers of the anti-Federalist sentiment Still Sensible Jan 2013 #26
Come on now! It was to kill Indians, too. Deep13 Jan 2013 #27
That is part of it, but not as large as... nadinbrzezinski Jan 2013 #29
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Second Amendment was ...