Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts) Wed Jan 9, 2013, 06:18 PM Jan 2013

Sex tape revenge backfires on Burnsville woman [View all]

HASTINGS, Minn. (KMSP) -

A Burnsville, Minn., woman is facing felony charges after investigators claim she posted a sex tape she found on her boyfriend's cell phone in an attempt to get revenge.

According to criminal complaints filled in Dakota County, Kayla Jo Henry-Heagle, 21, found video of her boyfriend and his younger brother having oral sex with a couple of 17-year-old girls. Investigators say their oldest brother, 28-year-old Antonio Trice, was behind the camera in a Burnsville hotel room last June.

"I suspect, once this is reviewed further, there may be additional charges against the person who did the filming," said John Kingrey, executive director of the Minnesota County Attorneys Association.

31 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Sex tape revenge backfires on Burnsville woman [View all] banned from Kos Jan 2013 OP

What's the point of this post? leftstreet Jan 2013 #1

Drama TXDem72 Jan 2013 #2

I'll find a better source, the story is very bizarre rbixby Jan 2013 #3

Here we go rbixby Jan 2013 #4

yes, that is a better story and link. The moral is - banned from Kos Jan 2013 #6

I find it interesting ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #5

Alternatively, she had no knowledge that they were adults, yet she posted the video. Scuba Jan 2013 #7

But in most jurisdictions ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #9

Thanks. I obviously shouldn't be giving legal advice. Scuba Jan 2013 #10

Before November 18, 1988 you would be correct. TheManInTheMac Jan 2013 #23

And after the 1994 SCOTUS Decision ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #24

Yeah... 'interesting' is one word for it. nt redqueen Jan 2013 #11

ya. i am thinking about those that had a sex act with the minors. and the one filming seabeyond Jan 2013 #12

I'm pretty sure everyone is facing charges in this case rbixby Jan 2013 #13

i do not know why you would be pretty sure. i heard just a possibility of added charges to the one seabeyond Jan 2013 #14

The guy that film is also being prosecuted Sissyk Jan 2013 #26

I'd read other articles about this yesterday, apparently she knew. polly7 Jan 2013 #15

Okay ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #16

It is a strict liability law AngryAmish Jan 2013 #17

No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #18

You are right, I am wrong AngryAmish Jan 2013 #21

Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #22

Not sure about the particular state, but Last Stand Jan 2013 #20

She admits she knew they were underage. MicaelS Jan 2013 #27

Yep ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #28

Jealousy and anger can make people do weird things. MicaelS Jan 2013 #29

I can see that ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2013 #30

wierd samsingh Jan 2013 #8

Wow you won't believe this but... mnmoderatedem Jan 2013 #19

So it's okay for a 16-year-old to have sex in MN, but it's a crime to film a legal activity? Weird. Comrade Grumpy Jan 2013 #25

Sounds like the tape backfired on everyone. In_The_Wind Jan 2013 #31