Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 02:21 PM Jan 2013

"we aren’t nominating Chuck Hagel to be Israel’s Secretary of Defense, but our own" [View all]

Some Republicans are already freaking out over the potential nomination of Hagel:

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) on Sunday expressed dismay at reports President Obama would tap former Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) for Secretary of Defense, calling it an “in your face” selection.

“He has long severed his ties with the Republican party. This is an in your face nomination of the president to all of us who are supportive of Israel,” he added.


What’s so amazing to me is that Graham, who used to be (I don’t know if he still is) a reserve JAG officer, swore an oath when he joined the military. Here it is:

I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.


Oddly enough, there is not one word in there about Israel. Maybe Graham isn’t clear that we aren’t nominating Chuck Hagel to be Israel’s Secretary of Defense, but our own.

...So I want to have this fight. Let’s let Graham and all the others go in front of a camera and proclaim to the world that their top consideration for the American Secretary of Defense is… his deference to foreign nation. Bring it on, Lindsey.

http://www.balloon-juice.com/2013/01/06/i-want-to-have-this-fight-too/
28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Yes, I think it would be very enlightening to have the Armed Services committee TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #1
Well, he is anti-gay and anti-choice, but I don't think that matters to you anti-Israel folks HERVEPA Jan 2013 #2
Please link so it can be discussed. We are discussing Defense, not human rights. freshwest Jan 2013 #3
We are never not discussing human rights Lordquinton Jan 2013 #11
True, just no links to say Hagel is anti-Israeli, humans, etc. as asserted. freshwest Jan 2013 #13
After reading that Lordquinton Jan 2013 #19
Thanks and just found this bit about Hagel: freshwest Jan 2013 #20
"supports cuts in military spending" Qutzupalotl Jan 2013 #26
Agreed. The Israel issue may be cover for their sponsors, and used as dog whistle for their fundies. freshwest Jan 2013 #28
THANK YOU Skittles Jan 2013 #22
Some people are unable to make the connections HERVEPA Jan 2013 #24
Prove that I am anti-Israel in any way. It's not anti-Israel to recognize TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #4
Neo Cons Wouldn't Give A Shit About Hagel's Other Positions if He Shared Their War Views Indykatie Jan 2013 #9
Yep--funny to watch magazines like the Weekly Standard suddenly obsessed TwilightGardener Jan 2013 #10
isreal's a big boy now maybe it's tme to stop nursing at the breast of the us leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #6
First of all, Hagel admitted he was wrong to say what he said about Hormel Ken Burch Jan 2013 #15
It sounds to me like he could be A Simple Game Jan 2013 #16
Glenn Greenwald, who is gay, addressed the anti-gay issue NoMoreWarNow Jan 2013 #23
does this fucker ever stop whining? spanone Jan 2013 #5
He probably sleeps sometimes. (nt) Posteritatis Jan 2013 #7
Well, I guess he believes in doing repeatedly that which he does best. calimary Jan 2013 #12
Graham again? Well that is 1 percent of the senate pwb Jan 2013 #8
So sick of the Likud deciding who we should nominate LittleBlue Jan 2013 #14
You lost Buddy, get used to it. nt bemildred Jan 2013 #17
SecDef should have a basic opposition to war. Cynicus Emeritus Jan 2013 #18
I'm sick of those who think we need to check with Israel first before we approve or disapprove. xxxsdesdexxx Jan 2013 #21
It may be a great signal to Netanayu not to bite the hand malaise Jan 2013 #25
About time. Jester Messiah Jan 2013 #27
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"we aren’t nominatin...