Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Lurks Often

(5,455 posts)
35. A non-military starship would indeed have a smaller crew,
Reply to KG (Reply #6)
Sat Jan 5, 2013, 07:43 PM
Jan 2013

but the starships we see in ST are for military and long range exploration.

In the real world, naval warships have always had larger crews then a commercial vessel, it was done that way to allow for damage control, crew loss and if you go back to the days of sail, boarding and prize parties.

Our entire technological infrastructure is supported by a global network of human slavery NoOneMan Jan 2013 #1
+10000 YoungDemCA Jan 2013 #22
When do we transition to sharing the profits? leftstreet Jan 2013 #2
Do what you can to invest in these corporations. dkf Jan 2013 #7
No. Just nationalize them leftstreet Jan 2013 #8
I'm not a communist or socialist if that is what you are asking. dkf Jan 2013 #9
There's a difference between owning a car or owning a factory leftstreet Jan 2013 #14
I believe that anything can be built can be owned. dkf Jan 2013 #16
People have "factories" in their basements. Fumesucker Jan 2013 #17
Those who live to work will work those that don't won't Fumesucker Jan 2013 #10
Well that minority will be even more of a minority. dkf Jan 2013 #12
If you want to know something these days more and more the education is at your fingertips Fumesucker Jan 2013 #15
Maybe it is a bipolar condition combined with genius. dkf Jan 2013 #18
For the most part, creative people aren't primarily motivated by profit. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #26
actually, most people are motivated that way until the system beats it out of them. HiPointDem Jan 2013 #33
Because we have not yet crossed that point when Lurks Often Jan 2013 #34
I think we all agree, snot Jan 2013 #3
EROEI tama Jan 2013 #4
we're in a transition between relative surplus of cheap energy and scarcity datasuspect Jan 2013 #5
Solar is the future...at least here. dkf Jan 2013 #13
Famine is the future NoOneMan Jan 2013 #19
I absolutely agree. Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #28
Scary. And you can't prepare enough for that. dkf Jan 2013 #38
yes. more people, less labor in the future. it's a reality few in politics are willing to address. KG Jan 2013 #6
A non-military starship would indeed have a smaller crew, Lurks Often Jan 2013 #35
Definitely. JaneyVee Jan 2013 #11
One thing not yet overcome: greed as a core (external) value. BadgerKid Jan 2013 #20
Or the limits to growth NoOneMan Jan 2013 #23
As the various nations develop fully customerserviceguy Jan 2013 #31
We've been in such a period for nearly three hundred years. (nt) Posteritatis Jan 2013 #21
I see the Peak Oil Doomers have arrived. Odin2005 Jan 2013 #24
Running out of dirty energy is a hopeful best case scenario NoOneMan Jan 2013 #27
We need to look at alternatives to the top-down, vertically integrated corporations we have now! LongTomH Jan 2013 #25
We are certainly in a transitional period in regards to technology... Moonwalk Jan 2013 #29
That's a pretty thoughtful insight customerserviceguy Jan 2013 #32
We are inside the fall of industrial civilization. Speck Tater Jan 2013 #30
a fully automated society can't work without a strong social safety net librechik Jan 2013 #36
It seems likely that in a fully automated society, Lurks Often Jan 2013 #39
No. We're transitioning into cooking our family pets on the grill to stay alive. RagAss Jan 2013 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Are we in a transitional ...»Reply #35