Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

Taverner

(55,476 posts)
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 06:33 PM Dec 2012

How many here have actually READ the Warren Report? [View all]

This discussion thread was locked as off-topic by REP (a host of the General Discussion forum).

I have: twice

I read it in college, and concluded JFK had to have been killed by only Oswald, and he was a lone nut, not working with anyone.

I read it again recently, and with a bit more science behind the belt, and have concluded great portions of it are not consistent with evidence.

For example, only three of Oswald's bullets could have hit Kennedy. The fourth bullet had to be from someone else.

I'm not saying it is a huge reaching conspiracy, I'm not saying that. You might THINK that I'm saying that, and put words into my mouth as the trollis tend to do.

But the Warren Report is at best deliberately leaving out evidence and ignoring other evidence.

Take that to mean what you want...


28 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The warren report was shit. Warren Stupidity Dec 2012 #1
The Warren Commission Report was created far too quickly. Cooley Hurd Dec 2012 #2
The only thing that we know for sure is that there had to be a second gunman Taverner Dec 2012 #4
I read it gopiscrap Dec 2012 #3
Americans will believe anything....they are pretty much mindless... lib2DaBone Dec 2012 #5
9/11 was whiny millionares and their pet government Taverner Dec 2012 #6
I disagree with your conclusion. nfm arthritisR_US Jan 2013 #24
"You can always trust government. Smirk." - George AWOL Bush (R - Skull & Boner) Berlum Dec 2012 #7
I don't know - The Bush Administration was WAY to inept to pull that off Taverner Dec 2012 #12
Oh come on! Shrub was the puppet but those arthritisR_US Jan 2013 #22
I saw a copy on the shelf of the used book store last week and dam near bought it 1-Old-Man Dec 2012 #8
. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #9
Have you read it? Taverner Dec 2012 #10
. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #11
. Taverner Dec 2012 #13
. RomneyLies Dec 2012 #17
I still think Mary Surratt was framed. rug Dec 2012 #14
So do I. arthritisR_US Jan 2013 #23
I did not believe it was accurate from the day it was published n/t Dalai_1 Dec 2012 #15
I dont generally go in for conspiracy theories, but the official JFK explanation does not fly. Warren DeMontague Dec 2012 #16
I go for the covering up ineptitude story Taverner Dec 2012 #18
By chance? democraticinsurgent Dec 2012 #19
Occam's Razor Taverner Jan 2013 #20
"deliberately leaving out evidence and ignoring arthritisR_US Jan 2013 #21
Quite the provocateur, aren't you? malz Jan 2013 #25
The Warren Commission Report was at most incomplete. Archae Jan 2013 #26
Read it almost 40 years ago Still Sensible Jan 2013 #27
Locking REP Jan 2013 #28
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How many here have actual...