Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Report1212

(661 posts)
Wed Dec 26, 2012, 11:59 AM Dec 2012

CORPORATE INTIMIDATION: Starbucks is basically forcing its employees to lobby Washington D.C. [View all]

Last edited Wed Dec 26, 2012, 02:16 PM - Edit history (2)

This is wildly inappropriate

CNN reports that Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz has written a letter to his chain’s 120 stores in the Washington, D.C. area to ask employees there to write “Come Together” on coffee cups on Thursday and Friday.

“Rather than be bystanders, you and your customers have an opportunity — and I believe we all have a responsibility — to send our elected officials a respectful but potent message, urging them to come together to find common ground,” Schultz wrote in his letter to the stores. He also apparently cited Fix The Debt, the powerful corporate front group that has been pushing for an agreement to cut Social Security benefits and lower corporate tax rates for months.

In a statement to CNN, the company stressed that these messages are voluntary.

But by even asking employees to voluntarily influence lawmakers to reach an agreement, Schultz is inappropriately pressuring them to take a political stand they may not agree with. For example, some of these employees may benefit from veterans or Social Security benefits that are at risk of being cut in a bad deal.



Read more: http://boldprogressives.org/starbucks-is-inappropriately-enlisting-its-d-c-employees-in-fiscal-lobbying/

UPDATE:
UPDATE II: I talked to a Starbucks employee in the D.C. area. This is what they had to say about being asked to take part in this campaign:

[It's] absolutely stupid. I don't get paid nearly enough to write that on all the cups. It's like I'm being punished in elementary school, except instead of a chalkboard, I have hundreds of cups. The message is Starbucks doesn't care about their "partners." They will be forced to do more work that is necessary or good, and not compensate them for it, and try to put out their message even if the "partner" doesn't agree with it. ... Compromise would get something done, but it'll leave a [bad] deal for the working poor and the middle class.
33 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Lower Corporate Tax rates to what - 0% FreakinDJ Dec 2012 #1
They'd actually like it less than that. Scuba Dec 2012 #30
I won't be one of them, I've only drunk the crap they serve up a couple of times. n/t RKP5637 Dec 2012 #2
Good on you. Read the update. Employees hate it n/t Report1212 Dec 2012 #33
I am not sure if 'come together' is 'wildly inappropriate'. renie408 Dec 2012 #3
What if the employees don't like the deal? Report1212 Dec 2012 #6
What the OP left out of their post which makes renie408 Dec 2012 #9
it's more than inappropriate, no matter how supposedly voluntary. you don't even *ask* your HiPointDem Dec 2012 #18
Define "our way." merrily Dec 2012 #11
You need to ask the people who think going over the cliff renie408 Dec 2012 #14
That's your view Report1212 Dec 2012 #16
For chrissakes, they do not have to 'stand up' renie408 Dec 2012 #21
Or you don't have any sympathy for minimum wage employees who are Report1212 Dec 2012 #22
Yep. That's me. renie408 Dec 2012 #23
You sound more outraged than anyone else here Report1212 Dec 2012 #24
Wait, I thought it was wildly inappropriate to make suggestions. renie408 Dec 2012 #25
Am I your employer? Report1212 Dec 2012 #26
No renie408 Dec 2012 #27
Cutting a deal is a viewpoint Report1212 Dec 2012 #28
So you don't write anything on the cup. renie408 Dec 2012 #29
When the boss man tells you to do something, you do it Report1212 Dec 2012 #32
so far this is the least outrage-worthy thing i have read today arely staircase Dec 2012 #4
They're not 'forcing' anyone to do anything. But the CEO is definitely being an ass. randome Dec 2012 #5
I just don't think these corporations are being honest Report1212 Dec 2012 #7
Forcing employees to make a political statement should be illegal FreakinDJ Dec 2012 #8
I agree but they'll parse the definition of force Report1212 Dec 2012 #10
They are not being forced. If it makes them uncomfortable, they don't have to write anything. renie408 Dec 2012 #12
When the CEO of your corporations writes you a letter telling you to do something.. Report1212 Dec 2012 #15
they *are* being pressured. HiPointDem Dec 2012 #20
Sure it is. But there is no 'enforcement', either. randome Dec 2012 #17
I agree. Report1212 Dec 2012 #19
Agree. No political "suggestions" from the boss. merrily Dec 2012 #13
Crappy coffee and corprat cronyism. Two reasons.... ProfessionalLeftist Dec 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»CORPORATE INTIMIDATION: S...