General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The "Gun Show Loophole" solution? [View all]pipoman
(16,038 posts)I believe one of the reasons most states don't have a requirement for background checks is because, as it is now, they would have to fund the system somehow. There isn't a mechanism for this to be easily accomplished without a lot of expense at the state level. If the system was in place and could be implemented by the state without cost, more states may require it.
Second paragraph..correct
Third..This is an answer to the complex question of intrastate private gun sales. Every real or perceived problem would require it's own discussion IMO.
I don't believe it will stop any event necessarily. If it does, we'll never know it, huh? I don't believe it is possible to limit the rights of people who have been convicted of nothing...maybe a felon could be prohibited from living in a home with a gun...again a whole other discussion with it's own nuances.