Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
25. ...
Thu Dec 20, 2012, 10:24 AM
Dec 2012

I agree that mass/spree/rampage killing is rare. Most firearms related murders are committed by people who legally aren't allowed to possess firearms..convicted felons. Nobody is suggesting that all people with mental illness are mass killers, just that the majority of mass killers have mental illness. Elimination of guns (as if that is even a reasonable expectation) wouldn't make those who plan mass killings not plan mass killings. Guns don't cause mass killings, sick minds do.

According to the CDC (http://webapp.cdc.gov/sasweb/ncipc/mortrate10_sy.html), there are were 625 gun related deaths of children 0-15 in 2007 (the most recent info on CDC). That is a lot of kids. OTOH, there were 832 who drown (usually in backyard pools) and 2,344 in motor vehicles, many in sporting accidents.. The point is that while each child death is a tragedy, there are many things which result in child deaths and always will.

I don't know where you got the idea that online sales of firearms are not subject to background checks. They are if they are interstate transactions. If I want to sell a gun on gunbroker.com, and I sell the gun to someone in another state, I am required to mail the gun to a federal firearms licensee in the buyers state, then the buyer has to complete a background check through NICS to take possession. If it is a handgun, I have to take the gun to a FFL in my state who has to mail it to a FFL in the buyers state and the buyer has to complete an NICS check before taking possession. Anyone mailing a gun to a private individual in another state is violating federal law. If I send a gun back to the manufacturer for repair, they will mail it to a FFL in my state and I have to pass an NICS check before I can pick up my own gun.

As for the private sale notion that the NRA has anything to do with...not. The "commerce clause" of the US constitution doesn't allow for federal regulation of intrastate commerce of legal products. This has no connection to the NRA. The feds are prohibited from regulating intrastate commerce. States can (and a few do) require background checks for private intrastate sales. The only way there will ever be a requirement for background checks on private intrastate sales will be if the states enact the requirement. Further, even if I want to use the NICS system to transfer a gun to a buyer within my state, I can't access it. I have ideas about how to make this system better, but alas, most in favor of gun control don't really want to make it better, they want to eliminate the commerce clause...an impossibility...and won't hear anything else..

I would think mental health advocates would embrace an opportunity to re-fund mental health services to a level prior to Raygun administration's defunding.

The snippet you posted is wrong. randome Dec 2012 #1
Maybe would be if a good share of rampage shooters didn't turn out pipoman Dec 2012 #2
70% of murders are by guns BainsBane Dec 2012 #12
Why not both? Arcana Dec 2012 #13
I'm fine with that BainsBane Dec 2012 #17
But scapegoating legal gun owners is perfectly acceptable hack89 Dec 2012 #27
no one is scapegoating gun owners BainsBane Dec 2012 #29
So all those OPs equating gun ownership with mental illness hack89 Dec 2012 #30
Did I write them? BainsBane Dec 2012 #31
Just pointing out the mood of DU hack89 Dec 2012 #32
. . . BainsBane Dec 2012 #34
Democrats own guns hack89 Dec 2012 #35
what point was that? BainsBane Dec 2012 #36
I am certainly will to consider reforms hack89 Dec 2012 #37
So the majority of these rampage killings aren't also pipoman Dec 2012 #14
A fraction of murders BainsBane Dec 2012 #16
... pipoman Dec 2012 #25
Another point BainsBane Dec 2012 #18
I agree with all of this.. pipoman Dec 2012 #26
That mass murder of people of color is utterly ignored Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #3
The constant war tama Dec 2012 #4
Some of us have nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #6
Some black Connecticut residents question media attention on Newtown shootings FarCenter Dec 2012 #11
It's a problem "white america" may not be interested in addressing, much less solving. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #42
Nope, not one bit nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
Yes, of course it is. H2O Man Dec 2012 #7
So the majority of these guys aren't mentally ill? pipoman Dec 2012 #9
Which guys? H2O Man Dec 2012 #10
Rampage killers. pipoman Dec 2012 #15
"Rampage killers" is a H2O Man Dec 2012 #28
In the case of Jared Loughner, James Holmes, and Seung-Hui Cho, weren't they just expelled and Arcana Dec 2012 #38
Don't you understand... pipoman Dec 2012 #40
I understand. H2O Man Dec 2012 #41
There has been borderline conceptual discussion of it here in GD, in poll form etc. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #43
I think that would be ridiculous pipoman Dec 2012 #49
You lost me at "PETA vegan is outrageous." Didn't bother to read the rest. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #8
How could anyone possibly think this creates stigma? Denninmi Dec 2012 #19
there's some big brother shit being suggested fizzgig Dec 2012 #21
Yup, my exact thought. Denninmi Dec 2012 #22
When advocates and activists say "Let's have the conversation" I think they prefer more level-headed Arcana Dec 2012 #23
It's a little hard not to take it personally Denninmi Dec 2012 #24
I understand Arcana Dec 2012 #39
it does when it calls for a broadbrush abrogation of our rights fizzgig Dec 2012 #20
I am opposed to mentally ill people with potentially violent tendencies having firearms el_bryanto Dec 2012 #33
Perhaps because such is being stated in broad brush strokes without real knowledge of mental illness Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #44
There's nothing controversial about that, but that's not REALLY the nature of the concern. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #45
"mentally ill people with violent tendencies" loyalsister Dec 2012 #46
Spot on! Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #48
Yes, it's stigmatising Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is having the conversatio...»Reply #25