Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Arcana

(98 posts)
Wed Dec 19, 2012, 09:56 PM Dec 2012

Is having the conversation about mental illness and horrendous violent crime stigmatizing? [View all]

I hang around tumblr a lot, which is notorious for being full of the type of liberal activist that only cares about LGBT/race/discrimination issues and no other important issues, and in a way that is obnoxious such as denying the science that proves being obese is unhealthy, and defending people who say they identify as animals, hobbits, elves, and Navi'i and tossing around words like "oppression", "privilege" and "erasure" out of context and applied to every little thing. Fortunately not everyone there is like that and people are working to restore "sanity" there, but still a lot of things spread there are kinda...very questionable but don't sound as outrageous as a PETA vegan so are still agreed upon by thousands.

One of those things is the idea that talking about mental illness in relation to recent mass shootings is stigmatizing and "hurtful", even if it means not talking about the role it has played in the recent cases.

There’s something I want to say about the Connecticut shooting that hasn’t been sitting well with me and it’s how a lot of people talking about this shooter are quantifying his motivations as being due to mental illness

I know a lot of people who follow me don’t really seem to buy social theories about white privilege and ableism (to be frank, I don’t know why you’d be here if you don’t, but that’s another discussion altogether) but here’s why doing that is kind of hurtful

Very few, if any of these sorts of tragedies are caused by mental illness when the killers are professionally evaluated and that’s because more often than not, these are not regrettably avoidable instances where proper psychiatric care would prevent them - they’re the power fantasies of privileged white males who grow up in a culture of fetishized violence

This is important to note for two reasons

If the killer wasn’t white, the media would have absolutely no problem calling it terrorism or levying allegations of gang connections
People with mental illnesses are not ticking timebombs and there are huge differences between mental illness and mental disturbances and people who suffer from mental illnesses severe enough to push them to do something like this show extremely troubling warning signs long before they have the chance to do something, if they’re not already incarcerated for lesser crimes
I know you guys think you’re contributing to a positive and accepting discourse by saying one of the ways we can learn from this horrific event is to provide better care for people with mental illnesses but what you are doing is implicitly adding an “or else…” to the end of that sentence and that’s very hurtful to a lot of people, some of whom I bet you care about

http://confusedtannenbaum.tumblr.com/post/38066464468/theres-something-i-want-to-say-about-the

And then there's this article which is not hosted on tumblr but has been spread around tumblr, which criticizes the "I am Adam Lanza's Mother" article as "objectifying" and suggests misogyny as an alternate source of preventing mass shootings.

I think they do have a point, that we should be very careful about how we discuss mental illness in the context of violent crime. However I don't think we should ignore the role it has played in previous mass shootings(not to mention Cho in the Virginia Tech chooting was not white) nor in other cases like Tarasoff and Andrea Yates and Hinkley. This is something that needs to be talked about among professionals and policymakers, even though it may be twisted by ignorant members of the general public. Lets not forget that Seng-Hui Cho, James Holmes, and Jared Loughner were all simply booted out and not given additional help.

Just because of stigma does not mean we should shut our mouths about it when it has some real basis on reality, especially when a death toll is involved.

Mass shootings are rare events statistically, but that does not remove how devastating they are and their death toll.

I say this as someone who has been though a shitty American, state-run community mental health care system myself.
49 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The snippet you posted is wrong. randome Dec 2012 #1
Maybe would be if a good share of rampage shooters didn't turn out pipoman Dec 2012 #2
70% of murders are by guns BainsBane Dec 2012 #12
Why not both? Arcana Dec 2012 #13
I'm fine with that BainsBane Dec 2012 #17
But scapegoating legal gun owners is perfectly acceptable hack89 Dec 2012 #27
no one is scapegoating gun owners BainsBane Dec 2012 #29
So all those OPs equating gun ownership with mental illness hack89 Dec 2012 #30
Did I write them? BainsBane Dec 2012 #31
Just pointing out the mood of DU hack89 Dec 2012 #32
. . . BainsBane Dec 2012 #34
Democrats own guns hack89 Dec 2012 #35
what point was that? BainsBane Dec 2012 #36
I am certainly will to consider reforms hack89 Dec 2012 #37
So the majority of these rampage killings aren't also pipoman Dec 2012 #14
A fraction of murders BainsBane Dec 2012 #16
... pipoman Dec 2012 #25
Another point BainsBane Dec 2012 #18
I agree with all of this.. pipoman Dec 2012 #26
That mass murder of people of color is utterly ignored Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #3
The constant war tama Dec 2012 #4
Some of us have nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #6
Some black Connecticut residents question media attention on Newtown shootings FarCenter Dec 2012 #11
It's a problem "white america" may not be interested in addressing, much less solving. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #42
Nope, not one bit nadinbrzezinski Dec 2012 #5
Yes, of course it is. H2O Man Dec 2012 #7
So the majority of these guys aren't mentally ill? pipoman Dec 2012 #9
Which guys? H2O Man Dec 2012 #10
Rampage killers. pipoman Dec 2012 #15
"Rampage killers" is a H2O Man Dec 2012 #28
In the case of Jared Loughner, James Holmes, and Seung-Hui Cho, weren't they just expelled and Arcana Dec 2012 #38
Don't you understand... pipoman Dec 2012 #40
I understand. H2O Man Dec 2012 #41
There has been borderline conceptual discussion of it here in GD, in poll form etc. Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #43
I think that would be ridiculous pipoman Dec 2012 #49
You lost me at "PETA vegan is outrageous." Didn't bother to read the rest. nt Honeycombe8 Dec 2012 #8
How could anyone possibly think this creates stigma? Denninmi Dec 2012 #19
there's some big brother shit being suggested fizzgig Dec 2012 #21
Yup, my exact thought. Denninmi Dec 2012 #22
When advocates and activists say "Let's have the conversation" I think they prefer more level-headed Arcana Dec 2012 #23
It's a little hard not to take it personally Denninmi Dec 2012 #24
I understand Arcana Dec 2012 #39
it does when it calls for a broadbrush abrogation of our rights fizzgig Dec 2012 #20
I am opposed to mentally ill people with potentially violent tendencies having firearms el_bryanto Dec 2012 #33
Perhaps because such is being stated in broad brush strokes without real knowledge of mental illness Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #44
There's nothing controversial about that, but that's not REALLY the nature of the concern. HereSince1628 Dec 2012 #45
"mentally ill people with violent tendencies" loyalsister Dec 2012 #46
Spot on! Fire Walk With Me Dec 2012 #48
Yes, it's stigmatising Spider Jerusalem Dec 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is having the conversatio...