General Discussion

JackRiddler

(24,979 posts)

31. In an ironic fashion, she has a point.

Wed Dec 19, 2012, 05:32 PM

Dec 2012

Not intentionally, and of course in classic conservative-confusionist fashion she's got the facts exactly reversed.

Prima facie, women and children were the target. This may have primarily been a femicide.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

49 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

unfuckingbelievable!? Top Conservative Publication: Shooting Occurred Because Women Ran The School?? [View all] trailmonkee Dec 2012 OP

"Charlotte Allen " Remember, she is the one who wrote this memorable column Mass Dec 2012 #1

Male teachers who played football in high school gollygee Dec 2012 #2

To have more males, teaching would have to pay more and be higher status. SharonAnn Dec 2012 #39

this obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #43

Whomp, there it is. Starry Messenger Dec 2012 #44

That truly beggars the imagination. hifiguy Dec 2012 #3

Yet... bongbong Dec 2012 #10

Wow, that is simply some industrial strength stupid right there. Lizzie Poppet Dec 2012 #4

In awe of such breathtaking stupidity deutsey Dec 2012 #5

it deserves the "Ann Coulter" award quinnox Dec 2012 #6

in addition to being unbelievably stupid, flakey_foont Dec 2012 #7

Was that written by Al Bundy? Hassin Bin Sober Dec 2012 #8

I keep thinking Lindsay Dec 2012 #9

That woman is an idiot. tblue Dec 2012 #11

I find this woman's thought process almost as hard to process as the carnage itself. KittyWampus Dec 2012 #12

It's a FACT children and parents Politicalboi Dec 2012 #13

their only hope is to keep the discussion moronic Enrique Dec 2012 #14

Disgusting. The only decent thing National Review ever did was their Altas Shrugged review. white_wolf Dec 2012 #15

Yeah, and Aurora was a feminized setting too. mainer Dec 2012 #16

It's because of "teh gays" in the arts and military, doncha know? deutsey Dec 2012 #21

Its always my peoples fault dontcha know n/t Agschmid Dec 2012 #47

Not surprised really. The National Review isn't eveny worthy of being used as toilet paper. Lone_Star_Dem Dec 2012 #17

WRONG Please proceed Dec 2012 #18

on top of everything else dsc Dec 2012 #19

I think males in an elementary school setting are a good thing. . . Journeyman Dec 2012 #20

The republican War on Women (and and apparently children, too) is ongoing Berlum Dec 2012 #22

Boy, that is nauseating. Those female teachers were just too TwilightGardener Dec 2012 #23

Women teachers and staff died trying to protect their students. HooptieWagon Dec 2012 #24

The women of Sandy Hook Elementary had dinosaur balls BeyondGeography Dec 2012 #25

hatred of women continues MFM008 Dec 2012 #26

omg, I went to the National Review page to read the whole article.... Little Star Dec 2012 #27

nevermind. I found it. Beaverhausen Dec 2012 #35

Just wait tomorrow it will be Separation Dec 2012 #28

Can these people get any more stupid? CanonRay Dec 2012 #29

Charlotte Allen and nor Christine Hoff Sommers obamanut2012 Dec 2012 #30

In an ironic fashion, she has a point. JackRiddler Dec 2012 #31

Howbout Ninja teachers, 007 super spy teachers or Robocop? livefromsac Dec 2012 #32

So dumb. nt ZombieHorde Dec 2012 #33

I'm sure there were more adults at that school than the 6 that were killed. Were none of them male? Beaverhausen Dec 2012 #34

There was at very least the janitor, so no, it's not true. JHB Dec 2012 #40

Yes, if only Chuck Norris ran the school, all the children would be safe. Quantess Dec 2012 #36

That sort of stupidity should cause great physical pain to Allen et alia REP Dec 2012 #37

And Fort Hood was feminized? That's why it got attacked? mainer Dec 2012 #38

And it was a woman Aerows Dec 2012 #46

Funny....I was thinking that the school needed a lot LESS "male aggression" kestrel91316 Dec 2012 #41

It's the GUNS, assholes! Not godlessness, not "feminization"... VOX Dec 2012 #42

Seemed to have performed bravely? Aerows Dec 2012 #45

The GOP 'War on Women' continues. n/t Tx4obama Dec 2012 #48

Sometimes I think conservatives love to be obnoxious a******s. reformist2 Dec 2012 #49