General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: I don't want John Kerry to even be considered as SOS [View all]mike_c
(36,281 posts)...if the democratic senate hadn't bent over and grabbed their collective ankles to give Bush his war of aggression in the middle east or what Kerry "really" meant when he voted to invade Iraq. The "facts" are as stated in my post above. If you can demonstrate that Kerry did not vote to authorize war with Iraq, please do so. The Congressional Record is need of correction if that's the case. If you can demonstrate that the IWR was irrelevant to the process then please do so, because the republic will have some loopholes to worry about.
But for the moment, those are just fantasies, because Kerry did vote to authorize a war of aggression against Iraq, with the clear knowledge that Bush would either decline the opportunity-- and if Kerry believed that we can add "incompetent fool" to his list of professional qualifications-- or that he would invade and kill innocent civilians for no good reason at all. I don't believe Kerry is a fool, so that leaves complicity in crimes against humanity. Not what I want in a Secretary of State.