Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Tsiyu

(18,186 posts)
2. It's the outcome of a bandaid approach
Fri Dec 7, 2012, 04:33 PM
Dec 2012

not the outcome of every program intended to fight poverty.

For example: There are dozens of groups selling themselves as foundations intended to "help Appalachia."

They get the grants and help themselves. I see it happen over and over. Yet we read articles like this on the bottom of the food chain, and rarely a story on the scavengers who have a second home in a gated community far removed from actual Appalachia selling their latest "foundation" as if they know a frickin' thing about Appalachia. Getting grants that should go to actual hurting mountain people.

These are well-to-do people who want to appear altruistic and wise, and maybe they have a smidge of care, but they are taking advantage of programs that really are designed to help the poor.

There are a handful of groups I know who do actually help; one was started by uppity wymmins here.

Appalachia's issues need to be resolved, and our "Pull yourself up by your bootstraps" Republican Supermajority in the state of Tennessee should make it a priority here, but of course Republicans want the little problem of Appalachia to be a SOCIALIZED problem. Especially when they know their own families benefit from the exploitation of the mountain people.

Republican Family Values: Privatize the profits of your exploitation of families, socialize the economic fallout for those families.


Anyhoo.....





Latest Discussions»General Discussion»This will not be popular ...»Reply #2