Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

TM99

(8,352 posts)
20. Yes, it does indeed
Mon Dec 3, 2012, 01:54 AM
Dec 2012

I couldn't agree more with what you say nolabear.

At some point during the last twenty years we, as a profession, have been sold this bill of goods that says an insurance agent in Topeka knows more about my client/patient than I do here face to face with them. We have been told to now treat the 'disease' (the labeled diagnosis) and not the person themselves.

I worked in clinical settings and took insurance for about a decade in my private practice. I went through a major health crisis and did not work for the better part of five years as I went through chemotherapy and then rehabilitation. I made a tough decision two years ago when I started back to work. I no longer take insurance...period. I have returned to my roots and practice somatics and psychodynamic approaches that still view the whole person within their various contexts, be it a marriage, a family, or a society.

If you haven't, check out the Psychodynamic Diagnostic Manual (PDM). It is an alternative used by various analytical therapeutic systems, however, it is very practical even for more 'modern' schools as it views the client as a whole system and not just a collection of symptoms looking for a labeled diagnosis.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Allen Frances and Dismay ...»Reply #20