Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

marmar

(77,081 posts)
Tue Nov 27, 2012, 10:54 AM Nov 2012

Robert Reich: Why is the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers Helping the Republicans? [View all]


Why is the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers Helping the Republicans?
Monday, November 26, 2012


Why is the White House trying to scare average people about the consequences of the “fiscal cliff?”

If the President’s strategy is to hold his ground and demand from Republicans tax increases on the wealthy, presumably his strongest bargaining position would be to allow the Bush tax cuts to expire on schedule come January – causing taxes to rise automatically, especially on the wealthy.

So you’d think part of that strategy would be reassure the rest of the public that the fiscal cliff isn’t so bad or so steep, and that at the start of January Democrats will introduce in Congress a middle-class tax cut whose effect is to prevent taxes from rising for most people (thereby forcing Republicans to vote for a tax cut for the middle class or hold it hostage to a tax cut for the wealthy as well).

But today (Monday) the White House’s Council of Economic Advisers issued a report today warning that if Congress allows the Bush tax cuts to expire January 1 and the Alternative Minimum Tax to kick in, the middle class will face sharply-rising taxes. ................(more)

The complete piece is at: http://robertreich.org/post/36593702879



57 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Because Obama is a neoliberal Lasher Nov 2012 #1
A couple of years ago Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2012 #19
Guess he didn't understand what an anarchist is. Lasher Nov 2012 #28
Thank you. JDPriestly Nov 2012 #35
I don't feel qualified to opine about the Federal Reserve. Lasher Nov 2012 #42
I know a man who calls for abolishing the Federal Reserve Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2012 #55
A "neoliberal"? I'm not sure that he ever described himself as a liberal, neoliberal or otherwise. AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2012 #32
NO. bvar22 Nov 2012 #36
The word neoliberal (new liberal) describes economic liberalism. Lasher Nov 2012 #37
For AMT it is an issue auto1969 Nov 2012 #34
What would be the result of the AMT patch expiration? Lasher Nov 2012 #44
I just don't appreciate the Obama thumping before anything has happened or been voted on auto1969 Nov 2012 #45
A link to a vague article from a rightwing website. Lasher Nov 2012 #46
Wow, even though it's from a "rightwing" website, its the truth auto1969 Nov 2012 #47
When you give criticism you should be prepared to deal with it yourself. Lasher Nov 2012 #53
Just as u should do ur homework before posting as well auto1969 Nov 2012 #57
Here are two links from (I hope good enough for you) reputable sources auto1969 Nov 2012 #48
AAAAAAAAAARRRRRRGHHHHHHHHH!!!! librechik Nov 2012 #2
Wrong. He started in 2008 Tansy_Gold Nov 2012 #51
Why exactly shouldn't ProSense Nov 2012 #3
A "spontaneous reply" in less than 7 minutes whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #6
Indeed. nt woo me with science Nov 2012 #8
You'd have had to squint real hard LondonReign2 Nov 2012 #10
I wonder what ProSense Nov 2012 #15
Oh its You. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #40
I'm good at ProSense Nov 2012 #13
What would have taken me longer whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #14
Yeah, ProSense Nov 2012 #16
No, you bash blindly instead of offering thoughtful defenses. geek tragedy Nov 2012 #20
What a lame ass, cowardly way to accuse someone of being a paid operative geek tragedy Nov 2012 #18
Oh shit, I missed that. ProSense Nov 2012 #21
Lol! whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #23
The substance and wit of your response accurately reflects geek tragedy Nov 2012 #24
geek unleashed whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #25
I normally don't feed trolls. nt geek tragedy Nov 2012 #26
How do you keep whatchamacallit Nov 2012 #27
Oh its You. bahrbearian Nov 2012 #38
Would you like to comment on any of the information NashvilleLefty Nov 2012 #43
Gee. If I wanted to have Republican policies, I'd have voted for one. Octafish Nov 2012 #4
Oh, no! Who could POSSIBLY have predicted this?! woo me with science Nov 2012 #5
Gosh, you'd think they would find a third way... Melinda Nov 2012 #7
Indeed. nt woo me with science Nov 2012 #52
The fix is in. That is my only conclusion after seeing David Plouffe last night. It's almost comical forestpath Nov 2012 #9
Yeah, Kabuki's gotta be that way. woo me with science Nov 2012 #11
The ''willing suspension of disbelief'' may soon no longer be a production value. Octafish Nov 2012 #31
"Buy-partisan," indeed. woo me with science Nov 2012 #49
Shocking indeed jsr Nov 2012 #12
I called the White House Liberalynn Nov 2012 #17
It's called leverage against the Republicans. If there's no deal, make them geek tragedy Nov 2012 #22
Barack Obama agent46 Nov 2012 #29
We Won! We should be leading the discussion, we should be making the decisions RepublicansRZombies Nov 2012 #30
I am far from a political strategist; but ... 1StrongBlackMan Nov 2012 #33
BOHICA ! bvar22 Nov 2012 #39
K&R woo me with science Nov 2012 #41
The "C Programming Language"? Fortinbras Armstrong Nov 2012 #56
Kick. woo me with science Nov 2012 #50
kick woo me with science Nov 2012 #54
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Robert Reich: Why is the ...