Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)
 

WillyT

(72,631 posts)
Mon Nov 26, 2012, 09:21 PM Nov 2012

Oh... NOW... I Get It... [View all]

HILL OF MEANS
Nearly half of Congress worth more than $1M, study reveals

By Mara Gay Sunday
November 20, 2011

<snip>

Forget Wall Street. With riches like these, “Occupy Congress” may make more sense.

That’s because 250 members of Congress — or 47 percent — have a net worth of more than $1 million, according to a new study by the nonpartisan Center for Responsive Politics.

The study, which analyzed data from legislators’ financial disclosure forms, found the average senator had a net worth of about $2.63 million last year. That’s up 11 percent from $2.38 million in 2009 and 16 percent from $2.27 million in 2008.

“The vast majority of members of Congress are quite comfortable financially, while many of their own constituents suffer from economic hardships,” Sheila Krumholz, executive director of the Center for Responsive Politics, said in a statement.

Some have suggested the dizzying financial success enjoyed by members of Congress is about more than luck, or even good business sense. Peter Schweizer, a fellow with the conservative Hoover Institution, has said lawmakers profit from a kind of “insider trading” that might get them in trouble outside the halls of Congress.

“There are all sorts of forms of honest grafts that congressmen engage in that allow them to become very, very wealthy. So it’s not illegal, but I think it’s highly unethical, I think it’s highly offensive, and wrong,” Schweizer, the author of “Throw Them All Out,” a book accusing congressmen of using their influence and connections to make smart investments, said in an interview with CBS’ “60 Minutes” this month.

“For example, insider trading on the stock market,” he said. “If you are a member of Congress, those laws are deemed not to apply.”

Krumholz appears to agree. “It’s no surprise that so many people grumble about lawmakers being out-of-touch,” she said. “Few Americans enjoy the same financial cushion maintained by most members of Congress — or the same access to market-altering information that could yield personal financial gains.”


That said...

<snip>

More: http://www.thedaily.com/page/2011/11/20/112011-news-congress-millionaires-1-4/

47 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oh... NOW... I Get It... [View all] WillyT Nov 2012 OP
Having a tyne Nov 2012 #1
What is the average yearly income? nadinbrzezinski Nov 2012 #2
Mid 40s vs almost 200K -> Just got a cool graphic from FB about that ... patrice Nov 2012 #12
This message was self-deleted by its author patrice Nov 2012 #13
Nice Graphic november3rd Nov 2012 #45
I'd LOVE To Have Your Problems... WillyT Nov 2012 #3
No shit obxhead Nov 2012 #11
I am in the same boat Illinoischick Nov 2012 #17
I think you're out of touch ... GeorgeGist Nov 2012 #6
Must be nice. MrSlayer Nov 2012 #8
I keep reading articles about how much you need spinbaby Nov 2012 #44
Well my net worth is about $4000. Illinoischick Nov 2012 #16
No, that has not happened to xxqqqzme Nov 2012 #26
And they don't even count the people who lost so much they had to zero out their meager Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #28
Re Jericoni Nov 2012 #33
I have a continuing 0 net worth Hydra Nov 2012 #40
So while the rest of us KT2000 Nov 2012 #4
... CrispyQ Nov 2012 #5
THANK YOU !!! WillyT Nov 2012 #7
+1 hrmjustin Nov 2012 #9
We need term limits and we need the revolving door between SomethingFishy Nov 2012 #10
How would that happen when the people who make the laws tblue37 Nov 2012 #21
And that is the million dollar question. CrispyQ Nov 2012 #31
Got me man... SomethingFishy Nov 2012 #46
We need a fundamental change in how our government is constituted and under what rules Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #29
Regarding the House: Here's a petition to recognize the Tea Party as a treasonous hate group: patrice Nov 2012 #14
The tea party is a distraction, nothing more. We have a fundamentally dysfunctional government Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #30
I agree that the 2 parties are similar - BUT not! the same & just as differences between you and patrice Nov 2012 #36
That's what I said. What I didn't say is that the two parties are the same, they aren't. Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #39
They go up there without a pot to piss in... kentuck Nov 2012 #15
I don't think they go up there poor hfojvt Nov 2012 #20
No "almost" about it. 2naSalit Nov 2012 #24
well, you do not have to be rich to RUN for Congress hfojvt Nov 2012 #25
Very true. kentuck Nov 2012 #37
The part about the Clintons is related yet unrelated Hydra Nov 2012 #41
the Clintons were hardly poor hfojvt Nov 2012 #43
to reverse Lincoln hfojvt Nov 2012 #18
Another look at this issue: patrice Nov 2012 #19
And we have the gall to call it a representative democracy. CrispyQ Nov 2012 #32
I've been meaning to look at that source to see what I think of it, but it's an INTERESTING graphic patrice Nov 2012 #34
I suspect this is BS. A million is a lot to most of us, but not to the wiggs Nov 2012 #22
Absolutely right. How can anyone seriously think that only 250 of them have more than $1 million? AnotherMcIntosh Nov 2012 #27
I think this too Hydra Nov 2012 #42
Huh. There's that pesky "47%" number again. chalky Nov 2012 #23
We have been tooting this HORN for Years!!! mstinamotorcity2 Nov 2012 #35
I've always said that 4_TN_TITANS Nov 2012 #38
Kick !!! WillyT Nov 2012 #47
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Oh... NOW... I Get It...