General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Poor Freeper [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)And if responding to ONE of your posts in months is 'following you around', then lucky you. I guess I am 'being followed around' by dozens of people here.
Twice in probably a year, I responded to one of your posts for the record. The number of false allegations you make affects your credibility, not mine. I saw a defense of a known anti-minority women and gays individual from you and commented on it which I will always do whether it is you or anyone else defending him.
But you have made a false allegation here. Not that that surprises me at all. So back it up and link to a post of mine that has ever supported a 'sexist'.
Let me help. Not convicting someone based on allegations is NOT supporting sexists. It is respecting the rule of law. You seem to be very confused about that. And that willingness to ignore evidence because of prejudices is a threat to women as well as men and is a threat to this democracy.
So with that out of the way, either post your links to me defending sexists, which btw my post above to which you responded was the exact opposite of, or I will assume you cannot.