Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)


(43,951 posts)
Tue Mar 19, 2024, 10:32 AM Mar 19

Ukraine war: Russia's hold on Crimea loosens [View all]

Ten years after Russia’s president, Vladimir Putin, annexed Crimea, its grip on the peninsula looks shaky.


Since the full-scale invasion in February 2022, Russia and Ukraine have battled for supremacy in the Black Sea (Peter Hermes Furian / shutterstock.com)

It is ten years since Russia illegally annexed Crimea on March 18th 2014. Subsequent efforts to integrate the peninsula firmly into the Russian Federation, however, have been far from the success story the Kremlin often likes to portray. In fact, comparing the increasingly shaky grip Moscow has on the peninsula today with the situation before the annexation would suggest Russia’s strategic position has actually worsened over the past decade. The Kerch bridge between Crimea and Russia opened to much fanfare in 2018 with the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, driving a truck across it. It has become a symbol not only of Russian occupation of Crimea but also of Ukrainian resistance. Spectacular Ukrainian attacks in October 2022 and July 2023 exposed the tenuousness of Russia’s connection to the peninsula. Not only that but repeated missile and drone attacks on Russian installations in Crimea and partisan activity in Crimea have heightened the sense of Russian vulnerability.

Black Sea successes

Most significant of all, Russia’s Black Sea fleet has suffered significant losses over the past two years. As a result of these Ukrainian successes, the Kremlin decided to relocate the Black Sea fleet from Sevastopol to Novorossiysk on the Russian mainland. Compare that with the situation before the annexation of Crimea in 2014, when Russia had a secure lease on the naval base of Sevastopol until 2042. Moreover, the Turkish closure of the Bosphorus and Dardanelles shortly after the start of Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 means that Russia can no longer freely move warships in and out of the Black Sea. This makes losses, such as those of the Black Sea fleet’s flagship cruiser Moskva in April 2022 and recently the patrol boat Sergey Kotov and the amphibian landing ship Caesar Kunikov, even more of a strategic blow to Russian capabilities.

These attacks also have a significant symbolic value for Ukraine and its allies. While the 2023 Ukrainian counter-offensive on the mainland failed to deliver on expectations, Kyiv’s deft deployment of air and sea drones and of longer-range missiles ensured a remarkable change of fortunes in the Black Sea. This was underlined recently when the Kremlin removed its second commander of the Black Sea Fleet since the invasion of Ukraine. Momentum around Crimea clearly seems to be on Ukraine’s side. Earlier this month, the Ukrainian intelligence chief, Kyrylo Budanov, signalled that a major operation aimed at further loosening Russia’s grip on Crimea was imminent. Apart from the strategic military and symbolic value of these Ukrainian successes, there is also a clear economic benefit. After Russia’s withdrawal from the Black Sea grain initiative brokered by Turkey and the United Nations, the fact that Moscow lost naval superiority in the Black Sea enabled Kyiv to establish its own shipping corridor. This now carries key Ukrainian agricultural exports to global markets at levels exceeding those during the period when the grain deal was actually in operation.

Russia nervous

This is overall undeniably good news at a time when there are many grim assessments of Ukraine’s prospects in this illegal Russian war. The renewed and arguably more optimistic focus on Ukraine was also obvious in recent comments by the French president, Emmanuel Macron. Recognising the strategic importance of the peninsula, including for the security of European Union members such as Romania and Bulgaria with their own Black Sea coastlines, Macron insisted that restoring Ukrainian sovereignty over Crimea was essential for lasting peace in the region. This contrasts sharply with a move by lawmakers in the Duma, Russia’s parliament. Members introduced a draft bill on March 11th that seeks to annul the transfer of Crimea from Russia to Ukraine by the former Soviet leader Nikita Krushchev in 1954. It is not clear what, if any, effect such a law would have on the international legal status of Crimea as part of sovereign Ukrainian territory. But it suggests a degree of nervousness in Moscow regarding its grip on the peninsula.

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Ukraine war: Russia's hol...