Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If it is not about a literal bloodbath [View all]Bernardo de La Paz
(50,303 posts)7. A prediction like that without a condemnation is a call. . . . nt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
57 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm not the one who implied the outcome is foreordained and that Biden is letting it happen NT
AZSkiffyGeek
Mar 2024
#18
Your post assumes that all the evidence was available in the first weeks
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#48
For the life of me, I do not know why we need to convince DUers that Trump says what he means...
hlthe2b
Mar 2024
#3
i don't think Trump would kill... because he'll get his minions to do it for him.
viva la
Mar 2024
#35
We are agreed it was a prediction. If he did condemn the implication, then it would not be a call
Bernardo de La Paz
Mar 2024
#22
Pol Potbelly won't say a goddamn thing if it stokes the fires of fucking hate in his piss-soaked base.
SoFlaBro
Mar 2024
#16
If he was talking about the auto industry, he'll be responsible for the bloodbath
KS Toronado
Mar 2024
#24
Why the auto industry? Is he saying this because Biden was on the picket line?
Deuxcents
Mar 2024
#33
As if his basket of deplorables get that subtlety. They're already armed. They've already committed violence ...
marble falls
Mar 2024
#29