Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So Jen Pskaki has these two guys on - Neil Katyal and Andrew Weissman - and boy are they spewing some crazy shit [View all]Srkdqltr
(6,535 posts)17. A sarcasm thingie is needed. Why would you call out those 2 and not think you would get severe pushback?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
117 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So Jen Pskaki has these two guys on - Neil Katyal and Andrew Weissman - and boy are they spewing some crazy shit [View all]
FHRRK
Mar 2024
OP
Time and again these legal heavyweights are proven correct in their analysis of court events.
rubbersole
Mar 2024
#14
You again with this crappola? What are you trying to prove? You posted this yesterday...
brush
Mar 12
#103
Both have solid, legal credentials and experience to back up what they say and question.
brush
Mar 2024
#69
A sarcasm thingie is needed. Why would you call out those 2 and not think you would get severe pushback?
Srkdqltr
Mar 2024
#17
A sarcasm gif is definitely needed. Your post sounds like it's from a trolll. This "crazy shit" is no joking matter.
brush
Mar 2024
#72
My only concern with the two is they may have too much face in the legal system
Bobstandard
Mar 12
#117
My question has always been whether it really matters how TFG is funding the bond.
Ocelot II
Mar 2024
#11
I have always thought that it was Musk who is putting up the collateral or cash for the bond.
Bev54
Mar 12
#111
Here we are running against the most vile candidate in history, and we are worried about a bond that will make
Silent Type
Mar 2024
#13
Yup. Maybe he got a sack of money to pay for it when Orban visited Mierda-Lardo.
Ocelot II
Mar 2024
#27
The judge has to approve the bond. If he thinks there was something untoward about it,
Ocelot II
Mar 2024
#78
I am wondering whether TFG tried to submit inaccurate or incomplete financials
Ocelot II
Mar 2024
#86
I agree completely. Why insult and demean people who are just asking questions?
Irish_Dem
Mar 2024
#41
Let's see, Donald didn't have the money, met with dictators, now he has the money.He shouldn't get benefit of the doubt
Walleye
Mar 2024
#36
Regardless of who put up the actual money, Trump HAS TO file it as "income" on his taxes.
world wide wally
Mar 2024
#50
He is my guess of who guaranteed the bond, as I said in an earlier comment, that does not
Bev54
Mar 12
#112
Glad I missed the 2, I'd have thought it's Collateral, and wonder why they think there's more to it than that.
elleng
Mar 2024
#60
You're responding to a post I made yesterday. He/she just posted the same thing today.
brush
Mar 12
#104
Same thread from yesterday that has been bumped up because there are new responses.
PufPuf23
Mar 12
#110
omg! ARE YOU IMPLYING THAT THEY WERE IMPLYING THAT WE SHOULDN'T TRUST TRUMP TO BE ABOVE BOARD?
orleans
Mar 2024
#65
If Trump becomes President his bond is a national security risk and we should know who he's beholden to.
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2024
#70
The fact that TFG is or may be beholden to third parties or foreign govts will be an issue
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 2024
#88
Why sarcasm emojis serve a useful purpose, and why no one should disdain their use.
ShazzieB
Mar 2024
#97